Consumer Rights Wiki talk:Moderators' noticeboard: Difference between revisions
clarify |
add hidden comment with instructions for archiving |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
<div style="padding: 0.25em 0; text-align: center; font-size: 150%; border-radius: 3px; font-weight: bold">[[Special:NewSection/Consumer Rights Wiki talk:Moderators' noticeboard|Start a new section]]</div> | <div style="padding: 0.25em 0; text-align: center; font-size: 150%; border-radius: 3px; font-weight: bold">[[Special:NewSection/Consumer Rights Wiki talk:Moderators' noticeboard|Start a new section]]</div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
{{Archives}} <!-- Mod instructions: when a discussion hasn't be replied to in seven days or is otherwise finished, please archive it to the most recent archive page. It will then be accessible on this template for others to read previous discussions. --> | |||
==Open tasks== | ==Open tasks== | ||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
:yeah thats me. i apologize for the strong language in my original post on the talk page of the [[Insta360 camera locks you out "to protect your consumer rights" - corporate gaslighting|article]]. I just dont feel these articles are worth anything at all. I doubt anyone would ever read them. And their existance may even turn people down from writing their own article on the subject since one (though of poor quality) already exists. I dont know why they were allowed in the first place, but i feel like they should be removed. In my opinion, they bring down the quality of the wiki. If a gouvernment representative ever looks at the wiki for info and falls onto AI bs, they might not see the wiki as a quality documentation. [[User:Plankton|Plankton]] ([[User talk:Plankton|talk]]) 01:24, 21 August 2025 (UTC) | :yeah thats me. i apologize for the strong language in my original post on the talk page of the [[Insta360 camera locks you out "to protect your consumer rights" - corporate gaslighting|article]]. I just dont feel these articles are worth anything at all. I doubt anyone would ever read them. And their existance may even turn people down from writing their own article on the subject since one (though of poor quality) already exists. I dont know why they were allowed in the first place, but i feel like they should be removed. In my opinion, they bring down the quality of the wiki. If a gouvernment representative ever looks at the wiki for info and falls onto AI bs, they might not see the wiki as a quality documentation. [[User:Plankton|Plankton]] ([[User talk:Plankton|talk]]) 01:24, 21 August 2025 (UTC) | ||
::I think you're right. They served a purpose to start with, but have outlived it. I'll do a proper purge of them and anything related to them shortly, starting with deleting those ones you linked just now [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 10:44, 21 August 2025 (UTC) | |||
:::Ok - I've deleted the transcripts which were on the site. I'll start the rest of the cleanup in a bit but in the meantime feel free to point out any references to them that need to go and I can mop them all up [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 11:02, 21 August 2025 (UTC) | |||
::::I assume [[Template:Autogenerated]] needs to go also? '''''[[User:JackFromWisconsin|📎 JackFromWisconsin]]''''' ([[User_talk:JackFromWisconsin|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/JackFromWisconsin|contribs]]) 15:00, 21 August 2025 (UTC) | |||