User talk:Luke Chitwood: Difference between revisions
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 21 August 2025 by Mr Pollo in topic When creating an article...
→When creating an article...: Reply |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I'm not saying it has to be a thesis, but there does need to be ''something'' of substance to it. — [[User:Sojourna|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna|talk]]) 20:58, 21 August 2025 (UTC) | I'm not saying it has to be a thesis, but there does need to be ''something'' of substance to it. — [[User:Sojourna|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna|talk]]) 20:58, 21 August 2025 (UTC) | ||
:I agree. It is important to add important information to the article regarding background and the incident itself since if you know more about the incident than the average person, it's beneficial for the wiki if you share the information while using trusted sources. [[User:Mr Pollo|Mr Pollo]] ([[User talk:Mr Pollo|talk]]) 21:48, 21 August 2025 (UTC) | :I agree. It is important to add important information to the article regarding background and the incident itself right after finish the page form since if you know more about the incident than the average person, it's beneficial for the wiki if you share the information while using trusted sources. [[User:Mr Pollo|Mr Pollo]] ([[User talk:Mr Pollo|talk]]) 21:48, 21 August 2025 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 21:48, 21 August 2025
When creating an article...
[edit source]...don't publish it if it's all purely placeholder (Crunch Fitness Subscription Cancelation Practice). It's worse than useless because:
- Users are less likely to take action if they see a blue link instead of a red link and it's not directly related to their goal/task.
- Visitors to the wiki are more likely to be left with a negative impression if something catches their attention, only to find their time wasted.
I'm not saying it has to be a thesis, but there does need to be something of substance to it. — Sojourna (talk) 20:58, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- I agree. It is important to add important information to the article regarding background and the incident itself right after finish the page form since if you know more about the incident than the average person, it's beneficial for the wiki if you share the information while using trusted sources. Mr Pollo (talk) 21:48, 21 August 2025 (UTC)