Disney wrongful-death lawsuit: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 15:14, 7 September 2025 edit Beanie Bo (talk \| contribs) confirmed, Administrators 433 edits Deletion request: This issue is not a consumer rights' issue. A lawsuit over an allergic reaction is entirely irrelevant. If the "issue" is that Disney used EULA roofie to argue against the lawsuit, then that can instead be added to the EULA roofie article and/or incident section of Disney's article. Additionally, article has not been updated since January. Tag: Visual edit ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 23:17, 24 September 2025 edit undo Mr Pollo (talk \| contribs) Administrators 1,592 edits No edit summary
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{Merge\|only needs EULA roofing and not every detail of lawsuit\|[[Disney+]]}}
	{{DeletionRequest\|This issue is not a consumer rights' issue. A lawsuit over an allergic reaction is entirely irrelevant. If the "issue" is that Disney used EULA roofie to argue against the lawsuit, then that can instead be added to the EULA roofie article and/or incident section of Disney's article.		{{DeletionRequest\|This issue is not a consumer rights' issue. A lawsuit over an allergic reaction is entirely irrelevant. If the "issue" is that Disney used EULA roofie to argue against the lawsuit, then that can instead be added to the EULA roofie article and/or incident section of Disney's article.