Jump to content

User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson/Sandbox: Difference between revisions

From Consumer Rights Wiki
Nvm.
AnotherConsumerRightsPerson changed the content model of the page User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson/Sandbox from "JavaScript" to "wikitext": JakeL please forgive me for what I just did
 
(91 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{hatnote|This is [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|AnotherConsumerRightsPerson]]’s Sandbox. The public sandbox is located [[Sandbox|here]].}}
<noinclude>{{User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson/Transcluded thingy}}</noinclude>
 
{{Main Page/Featured}}
Wow. I can actually do that.
 
== Hello. ==
 
This is made using [[Special:Newsection]]. Interesting, isn’t it?
 
Testing signatures.
 
*Current - [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|AnotherConsumerRightsPerson]] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|talk]])
 
*+Contribs - [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|AnotherConsumerRightsPerson]] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|talk]]/[[Special:Contribs/AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|contribs]]) There are a few ways I could go about this one, and if I make it my own it won’t look like this.
 
*Change formatting [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|{{colortext|green|Another}}{{colortext|red|Consumer}}]][[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|{{colortext|yellow|Rights}}{{colortext|blue|Person}}]] This one I don’t really like. Just dont see the point of colours here.
 
*Change formatting but italics [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|<i>AnotherConsumer</i>]][[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|RightsPerson]] Turned out worse than I thought it would. I mean I could do bold but… why?
 
*<b>End result -</b> Nevermind, decided against it, each one has something I don’t like. Might change my mind in the near future if I get the contribs one to look better though. UPDATE: Made my entire name bold in the editor and it looked really good, so I guess I will be changing my signature after all.

Latest revision as of 09:22, 13 March 2026