ASUS downgrades a well-reviewed monitor panel: Difference between revisions
m corrected capitalizations, in particular Asus is stylized as ASUS |
m Beanie Bo moved page ASUS silently downgrades monitor panel after it reviews well to ASUS downgrades a well-reviewed monitor panel: Changed wording to remove accusatory tone |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
The user-reported inferior performance of the new panel, the lack of any indication of a change (except service menu), combined with the glowing reviews of the original monitor, has led some people to make the unsubstantiated claim that it's possible that ASUS may have kept the exact same model number to intentionally deceive consumers who read reviews and discourage reviews of the new panel. However there is no direct evidence that ASUS deliberately intended to deceive the consumer or review sites. | The user-reported inferior performance of the new panel, the lack of any indication of a change (except service menu), combined with the glowing reviews of the original monitor, has led some people to make the unsubstantiated claim that it's possible that ASUS may have kept the exact same model number to intentionally deceive consumers who read reviews and discourage reviews of the new panel. However there is no direct evidence that ASUS deliberately intended to deceive the consumer or review sites. | ||
The same model number also meant that while no one seems to have actually measured the performance of the AUO panel version, TechSpot made the monitor [https://www.techspot.com/products/monitors/asus-vg259qm.217665/ " | The same model number also meant that while no one seems to have actually measured the performance of the AUO panel version, TechSpot made the monitor [https://www.techspot.com/products/monitors/asus-vg259qm.217665/ "Best of 2022"], directly referencing the 2020 Tom's Hardware review of the VG259QM with the old Qisda panel. | ||
==Details== | ==Details== | ||