Talk:Deceptive language frequently used against consumers: Difference between revisions
Add topicLatest comment: 8 October 2025 by JodyBruchonFan
Created page with "I hereby release my contributions to this article into the public domain under CC0 1.0. ~~~~" |
No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I hereby release my contributions to this article into the public domain under CC0 1.0. [[User:JodyBruchonFan|JodyBruchonFan]] ([[User talk:JodyBruchonFan|talk]]) 10:11, 1 October 2025 (UTC) | I hereby release my contributions to this article into the public domain under CC0 1.0. [[User:JodyBruchonFan|JodyBruchonFan]] ([[User talk:JodyBruchonFan|talk]]) 10:11, 1 October 2025 (UTC) | ||
:@[[User:JodyBruchonFan|JodyBruchonFan]] Please refrain from re-adding text that has been removed by moderators. More specifically, your mention of Google's supposed "conflict of interest" is a speculative opinion, which should not be done on the wiki, even for theme articles. Additionally, it detracts from the scope of this particular article. Try to keep your edits as neutral as possible. See [[Consumer Rights Wiki:Editorial guidelines|Editorial Guidelines]] for more information. [[User:Beanie Bo|Beanie Bo]] ([[User talk:Beanie Bo|talk]]) 14:03, 5 October 2025 (UTC) | |||
::The first removal was with the stated reason "low quality content", which implied to me I should use better wording. Thank you for the more detailed explanation. [[User:JodyBruchonFan|JodyBruchonFan]] ([[User talk:JodyBruchonFan|talk]]) 06:08, 8 October 2025 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 06:14, 8 October 2025
I hereby release my contributions to this article into the public domain under CC0 1.0. JodyBruchonFan (talk) 10:11, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
- @JodyBruchonFan Please refrain from re-adding text that has been removed by moderators. More specifically, your mention of Google's supposed "conflict of interest" is a speculative opinion, which should not be done on the wiki, even for theme articles. Additionally, it detracts from the scope of this particular article. Try to keep your edits as neutral as possible. See Editorial Guidelines for more information. Beanie Bo (talk) 14:03, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
- The first removal was with the stated reason "low quality content", which implied to me I should use better wording. Thank you for the more detailed explanation. JodyBruchonFan (talk) 06:08, 8 October 2025 (UTC)