Progress Report 2024-01-07: Difference between revisions

(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)

Line 34:

We need a single sample article for each of these types so that we can point users to what an ideal article would look like. '''Someone needs to write one of each!'''

# '''Themes''' ''High-level articles explaining and justifying core consumer protection concepts, providing examples of harm caused and their broader implications.''

# '''Themes''' ''High-level articles explaining and justifying core consumer protection concepts, providing examples of harm caused and their broader implications. ([[Forced Arbitration|Done]])''

# '''Companies''' ''Articles offering an overview of a company, its size, activities, and a summary of its consumer protection practices and controversies.''

# '''Product Lines''' ''Pages dedicated to specific product lines when discussing all of a company's activities in one article would be too cumbersome.''

# '''Product Lines''' ''Pages dedicated to specific product lines when discussing all of a company's activities in one article would be too cumbersome. [[HP Instant Ink|(done here )]]''

# '''Individuals''' ''Biographical articles about key individuals with significant influence over consumer protection-related decisions or incidents.''

# '''Individuals''' ''Biographical articles about key individuals with significant influence over consumer protection-related decisions or incidents.''[[Sample Individual|(DONE: 01-13-2025)]]

# '''Incidents''' ''Detailed accounts of specific events or chains of events involving anti-consumer activities, with citations and a focus on factual reporting.''

# '''Incidents''' ''Detailed accounts of specific events or chains of events involving anti-consumer activities, with citations and a focus on factual reporting. (we've got a [[Honey Browser Plugin|draft here]], but needs to comply with tone guidelines before it can be held up as an example)''

# '''Sources''' ''Articles describing information sources for the wiki, detailing their credibility and relevance, and providing suggestions for further article creation.''

# '''Sources''' ''Articles describing major information sources for the wiki (such as a Youtube channel with a long backlog of content to mine), detailing their credibility and relevance, and providing suggestions for further article creation. (example at the moment is the [[Video Table Fix Attempt|video list page]])''

# '''Transcripts''' ''Pages containing machine-generated transcripts of relevant videos, summaries, and tags to aid in article creation and avoid duplication.''

Line 60:

On a technical level, these should be implemented in much the same way as the stub - we just need different notices for different problem articles.<span id="to-do---stub-moderation-guidelines"></span>

=== TO DO - stub moderation guidelines must be added to moderation/rules ===

=== TO DO - stub moderation guidelines must be added to moderation/rules (Done ✅ on the moderator guidelines side) ===

These rules must be made clear in simple terms in the moderation guidelines in an easy to follow way:

* If an article is compliant according to the [https://wiki.rossmanngroup.com/index.php/Moderator_Guidelines Moderator Guidelines], it stays.

* If an article has POTENTIAL to be compliant according to the [https://wiki.rossmanngroup.com/index.php/Moderator_Guidelines Moderator Guidelines], it will have a Stub Notice placed at the top of the article as a warning with <code>{{StubNotice}}</code> which can only be removed by an administrator after the article has been appealed in the <code>#appeals</code> channel of the discord server.

* If an article has POTENTIAL to be compliant according to the [https://wiki.rossmanngroup.com/index.php/Moderator_Guidelines Moderator Guidelines], it will have a Stub Notice placed at the top of the article as a warning with <code><nowiki>{{StubNotice}}</nowiki></code> which can only be removed by an administrator after the article has been appealed in the <code>#appeals</code> channel of the discord server.

* If an article has NO CHANCE OF BEING COMPLIANT, it will not be deleted. Rather:

** the article will be edited to represent that it is non-compliant by an administrator

@@ Line 34: / Line 34: @@
 We need a single sample article for each of these types so that we can point users to what an ideal article would look like. '''Someone needs to write one of each!'''
-# '''Themes'''  ''High-level articles explaining and justifying core consumer protection concepts, providing examples of harm caused and their broader implications.''
+# '''Themes'''  ''High-level articles explaining and justifying core consumer protection concepts, providing examples of harm caused and their broader implications. ([[Forced Arbitration|Done]])''
 # '''Companies'''  ''Articles offering an overview of a company, its size, activities, and a summary of its consumer protection practices and controversies.''
-# '''Product Lines'''  ''Pages dedicated to specific product lines when discussing all of a company's activities in one article would be too cumbersome.''
+# '''Product Lines'''  ''Pages dedicated to specific product lines when discussing all of a company's activities in one article would be too cumbersome. [[HP Instant Ink|(done here )]]''
-# '''Individuals'''  ''Biographical articles about key individuals with significant influence over consumer protection-related decisions or incidents.''
+# '''Individuals'''  ''Biographical articles about key individuals with significant influence over consumer protection-related decisions or incidents.''[[Sample Individual|(DONE: 01-13-2025)]]
-# '''Incidents'''  ''Detailed accounts of specific events or chains of events involving anti-consumer activities, with citations and a focus on factual reporting.''
+# '''Incidents'''  ''Detailed accounts of specific events or chains of events involving anti-consumer activities, with citations and a focus on factual reporting. (we've got a [[Honey Browser Plugin|draft here]], but needs to comply with tone guidelines before it can be held up as an example)''
-# '''Sources'''  ''Articles describing information sources for the wiki, detailing their credibility and relevance, and providing suggestions for further article creation.''
+# '''Sources'''  ''Articles describing major information sources for the wiki (such as a Youtube channel with a long backlog of content to mine), detailing their credibility and relevance, and providing suggestions for further article creation. (example at the moment is the [[Video Table Fix Attempt|video list page]])''
 # '''Transcripts'''  ''Pages containing machine-generated transcripts of relevant videos, summaries, and tags to aid in article creation and avoid duplication.''
@@ Line 60: / Line 60: @@
 On a technical level, these should be implemented in much the same way as the stub - we just need different notices for different problem articles.<span id="to-do---stub-moderation-guidelines"></span>
-=== TO DO - stub moderation guidelines must be added to moderation/rules ===
+=== TO DO - stub moderation guidelines must be added to moderation/rules (Done ✅ on the moderator guidelines side) ===
 These rules must be made clear in simple terms in the moderation guidelines in an easy to follow way:
 * If an article is compliant according to the [https://wiki.rossmanngroup.com/index.php/Moderator_Guidelines Moderator Guidelines], it stays.
-* If an article has POTENTIAL to be compliant according to the [https://wiki.rossmanngroup.com/index.php/Moderator_Guidelines Moderator Guidelines], it will have a Stub Notice placed at the top of the article as a warning with <code>{{StubNotice}}</code> which can only be removed by an administrator after the article has been appealed in the <code>#appeals</code> channel of the discord server.
+* If an article has POTENTIAL to be compliant according to the [https://wiki.rossmanngroup.com/index.php/Moderator_Guidelines Moderator Guidelines], it will have a Stub Notice placed at the top of the article as a warning with <code><nowiki>{{StubNotice}}</nowiki></code> which can only be removed by an administrator after the article has been appealed in the <code>#appeals</code> channel of the discord server.
 * If an article has NO CHANCE OF BEING COMPLIANT, it will not be deleted. Rather:
 ** the article will be edited to represent that it is non-compliant by an administrator