Talk:Discord: Difference between revisions

(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)

Line 6:

I'm sure they did. Thanks for the assistance. [[User:Tob|Tob]] ([[User talk:Tob|talk]])

~~==Reg. "Introduction of forced arbitration (Mar. 2024)"==~~

An arbitration clause has been present in the ToS since 2017 as evident by [https://web.archive.org/web/20170521173532/https://discordapp.com/terms#:~:text=ARBITRATION this archive], therefor that section is inaccurate and should probably be removed and/or edited to reflect that.

==IPO and "enshitification"==

Line 28:

Line 24:

An arbitration clause has been present in the ToS since 2017 as evident by [https://web.archive.org/web/20170521173532/https://discordapp.com/terms#:~:text=ARBITRATION this archive], therefor that section is inaccurate and should probably be removed and/or edited to reflect that. [[User:Jerry|Jerry]] ([[User talk:Jerry|talk]]) 21:25, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

== Security risk: Presenting cryptic "direct link" in article ==

The "direct link" to assist with account deletion seems like a security risk for the reader. The link is to a cryptic domain ( dis.gd ), not the primary one for this company. Anybody could edit that URL on the wiki, substituting one that lead to a malicious website. I think the link should be removed unless somebody knows how to make the link secure.

"Direct link subject to user instance - http://dis.gd ..."

Thanks. [[User:Drakeula|Drakeula]] ([[User talk:Drakeula|talk]]) 00:41, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 I'm sure they did. Thanks for the assistance. [[User:Tob|Tob]] ([[User talk:Tob|talk]])
-==Reg. "Introduction of forced arbitration (Mar. 2024)"==
-An arbitration clause has been present in the ToS since 2017 as evident by [https://web.archive.org/web/20170521173532/https://discordapp.com/terms#:~:text=ARBITRATION this archive],  therefor that section is inaccurate and should probably be removed and/or edited to reflect that.
 ==IPO and "enshitification"==
@@ Line 28: / Line 24: @@
 An arbitration clause has been present in the ToS since 2017 as evident by [https://web.archive.org/web/20170521173532/https://discordapp.com/terms#:~:text=ARBITRATION this archive],  therefor that section is inaccurate and should probably be removed and/or edited to reflect that. [[User:Jerry|Jerry]] ([[User talk:Jerry|talk]]) 21:25, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
+== Security risk: Presenting cryptic "direct link" in article ==
+The "direct link" to assist with account deletion seems like a security risk for the reader.  The link is to a cryptic domain ( dis.gd ), not the primary one for this company.  Anybody could edit that URL on the wiki, substituting one that lead to a malicious website.  I think the link should be removed unless somebody knows how to make the link secure.
+"Direct link subject to user instance - http://dis.gd ..."
+Thanks. [[User:Drakeula|Drakeula]] ([[User talk:Drakeula|talk]]) 00:41, 9 October 2025 (UTC)