Talk:PayPal Honey: Difference between revisions
→New Insight and Findings + technical details: new section |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Legal Eagle also submitted a lawsuit against honey | Legal Eagle also submitted a lawsuit against honey | ||
== New Insight and Findings + technical details == | ==New Insight and Findings + technical details== | ||
MegaLag released two new videos, one on [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wwB3FmbcC88 22nd Dec 2025] and one today ([https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCGT_CKGgFE 30th Dec 2025]) giving much more detail about how honey was designed to purposely avoid detection and fraud other affiliate networks as well as their users. But this is rather technical. Would it be appropriate to dive into those details in the CRW article or should this be kept more general? [[User:Eck|Eck]] ([[User talk:Eck|talk]]) 22:08, 30 December 2025 (UTC) | MegaLag released two new videos, one on [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wwB3FmbcC88 22nd Dec 2025] and one today ([https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCGT_CKGgFE 30th Dec 2025]) giving much more detail about how honey was designed to purposely avoid detection and fraud other affiliate networks as well as their users. But this is rather technical. Would it be appropriate to dive into those details in the CRW article or should this be kept more general? [[User:Eck|Eck]] ([[User talk:Eck|talk]]) 22:08, 30 December 2025 (UTC) | ||
:I updated the article and stuck to a general outline. As much as the technical details ''are'' important, going into the weeds would do the main article no favors when we're aiming for a general audience. The "Incidents" section itself needs some trimming as it is, if someone wants tackle creating a separate article for a deeper dive into the overall controversy. — [[User:Sojourna|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna|talk]]) 23:41, 14 January 2026 (UTC) | |||