Device lifecycle: Difference between revisions
Removed 8 duplicate url-status parameter(s) from 8 citation(s) using CRWCitationBot |
Added "External threats to device lifecycle - https://www.itv.com/news/london/2026-03-11/met-tells-phone-companies-to-produce-unusable-bricks-in-bid-to-tackle-theft" Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Visual edit |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
##Repairs not possible/viable | ##Repairs not possible/viable | ||
== How decisions in different phases affect the product == | ==How decisions in different phases affect the product== | ||
=== Design === | ===Design=== | ||
Lifecycle costs are defined primarily during design phase.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2025-09-14 |title=How product design decisions can make or break your cost model |url=https://www.manufacturinghub.io/product-design/how-product-design-decisions-can-make-or-break-your-cost-model/ |url-status=live |access-date=2025-09-14 |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20251024111742/https://www.manufacturinghub.io/product-design/how-product-design-decisions-can-make-or-break-your-cost-model/ |archive-date=24 Oct 2025}}</ref> The impact estimates vary but are usually around 80% probably by reference to [[wikipedia:Pareto_principle|Pareto principle]]. | Lifecycle costs are defined primarily during design phase.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2025-09-14 |title=How product design decisions can make or break your cost model |url=https://www.manufacturinghub.io/product-design/how-product-design-decisions-can-make-or-break-your-cost-model/ |url-status=live |access-date=2025-09-14 |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20251024111742/https://www.manufacturinghub.io/product-design/how-product-design-decisions-can-make-or-break-your-cost-model/ |archive-date=24 Oct 2025}}</ref> The impact estimates vary but are usually around 80% probably by reference to [[wikipedia:Pareto_principle|Pareto principle]]. | ||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
Other thing playing significant role is spare part availability and general reliability. Are standardised easy to get components being prioritised in the design. Are the designs based on known good reference designs that might lack some performance for example. | Other thing playing significant role is spare part availability and general reliability. Are standardised easy to get components being prioritised in the design. Are the designs based on known good reference designs that might lack some performance for example. | ||
=== Useful life === | ===Useful life=== | ||
At least some products have repeating redesign rounds when they are being in active production. Some component availability might change and replacements are needed. Or management deems incoming warranty cases too infrequent and they see opportunity to cut BOM costs. As seen in official comment from Milwaukee Tools:<blockquote>Products can change several times within their lifetime for a variety of reasons, but the goal is always to exceed the users’ expectations. This time we clearly did not hit the mark.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2025-09-14 |title=Milwaukee 2767 M18 Fuel Impact Wrenc Issue: Official Response |url=https://www.protoolreviews.com/milwaukee-2767-m18-fuel-impact-wrench-issue-official-response/ |url-status=live |access-date=2025-09-14 |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20251020070625/https://www.protoolreviews.com/milwaukee-2767-m18-fuel-impact-wrench-issue-official-response/ |archive-date=20 Oct 2025}}</ref></blockquote>One hearsay is that first version of a product are the sturdiest and follow prudent design guidelines to minimise risks for need to expensive recall campaigns and unexpected increases in Costs Of Goods Sold<ref>{{Cite web |date=2025-09-14 |title=Cost Of Goods Sold explained |url=https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/cogs.asp |url-status=live |access-date=2025-09-14 |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20251114131028/https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/cogs.asp |archive-date=14 Nov 2025}}</ref>. When manufacturer has known good baseline that does not get too much warranty cases, they can start redesigning internal components while everything looks the same for consumers. | At least some products have repeating redesign rounds when they are being in active production. Some component availability might change and replacements are needed. Or management deems incoming warranty cases too infrequent and they see opportunity to cut BOM costs. As seen in official comment from Milwaukee Tools:<blockquote>Products can change several times within their lifetime for a variety of reasons, but the goal is always to exceed the users’ expectations. This time we clearly did not hit the mark.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2025-09-14 |title=Milwaukee 2767 M18 Fuel Impact Wrenc Issue: Official Response |url=https://www.protoolreviews.com/milwaukee-2767-m18-fuel-impact-wrench-issue-official-response/ |url-status=live |access-date=2025-09-14 |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20251020070625/https://www.protoolreviews.com/milwaukee-2767-m18-fuel-impact-wrench-issue-official-response/ |archive-date=20 Oct 2025}}</ref></blockquote>One hearsay is that first version of a product are the sturdiest and follow prudent design guidelines to minimise risks for need to expensive recall campaigns and unexpected increases in Costs Of Goods Sold<ref>{{Cite web |date=2025-09-14 |title=Cost Of Goods Sold explained |url=https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/cogs.asp |url-status=live |access-date=2025-09-14 |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20251114131028/https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/cogs.asp |archive-date=14 Nov 2025}}</ref>. When manufacturer has known good baseline that does not get too much warranty cases, they can start redesigning internal components while everything looks the same for consumers. | ||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
And the ultimate decision during useful life is the [[wikipedia:End-of-life_product|End Of Life (EOL) announcement]]. | And the ultimate decision during useful life is the [[wikipedia:End-of-life_product|End Of Life (EOL) announcement]]. | ||
===External threats to device lifecycle enhancements=== | |||
In the UK, according to ITV (Independent Television), the Met Police (Metropolitan Police) have reportedly threatened the telecommunications industry and phone makers to make phones that are stolen into "unusable bricks", with measures ranging from multi-factor authentication to serializing components within a device to make it harder for them to be salvaged for parts. | |||
Additionally, this news story reports that if efforts are not being made to reduce phone theft by June 1st, 2026, the Met Police will ask for these demands to be enforced at a governmental level, thus further compromising device lifecycle longevity, under the guise of phone theft | |||
See here: https://www.itv.com/news/london/2026-03-11/met-tells-phone-companies-to-produce-unusable-bricks-in-bid-to-tackle-theft | |||
==Why understanding the concept is important== | ==Why understanding the concept is important== | ||