Unlocking Technology Act of 2013: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
m wanted: digital lock |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|Description=This was a proposed law to restrict DMCA Section 1201 to only apply to copyright infringement, but it died in committee. | |Description=This was a proposed law to restrict DMCA Section 1201 to only apply to copyright infringement, but it died in committee. | ||
}} | }} | ||
The Unlocking Technology Act of 2013 was a proposed bipartisan law which would have modified Section 1201 of the DMCA to only restrict breaking digital locks for the sake of copyright infringement.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Couts |first=Andrew |date=2013-05-09 |title=Awesome new bill legalizes cell phone unlocking, 'fixes' the DMCA |url=https://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/new-bill-legalizes-cell-phone-unlocking-fixes-the-dmca/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260213170359/https://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/new-bill-legalizes-cell-phone-unlocking-fixes-the-dmca/|archive-date=2026-02-13|url-status=live |access-date=2026-02-24 |website=Digital Trends}}</ref> It died in committee.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |date=2013 |title=H.R. 1892 (113th): Unlocking Technology Act of 2013 |url=https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/113/hr1892 |url-status=live |access-date=2016-02-24 |website=www.GovTrack.us}}</ref> | The Unlocking Technology Act of 2013 was a proposed bipartisan law which would have modified Section 1201 of the DMCA to only restrict breaking [[Digital lock|digital locks]] for the sake of copyright infringement.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Couts |first=Andrew |date=2013-05-09 |title=Awesome new bill legalizes cell phone unlocking, 'fixes' the DMCA |url=https://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/new-bill-legalizes-cell-phone-unlocking-fixes-the-dmca/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260213170359/https://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/new-bill-legalizes-cell-phone-unlocking-fixes-the-dmca/|archive-date=2026-02-13|url-status=live |access-date=2026-02-24 |website=Digital Trends}}</ref> It died in committee.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |date=2013 |title=H.R. 1892 (113th): Unlocking Technology Act of 2013 |url=https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/113/hr1892 |url-status=live |access-date=2016-02-24 |website=www.GovTrack.us}}</ref> | ||
==Background== | ==Background== | ||
The [[Digital Millennium Copyright Act|Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA)]] Section 1201 was a law passed which was intended to prevent copyright infringement by making it illegal to break a digital lock (meaning bypass software restrictions put on a smart device). Companies have been making their devices smart partially to use this law to prevent people from modifying their products. | The [[Digital Millennium Copyright Act|Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA)]] [[DMCA Section 1201|Section 1201]] was a law passed which was intended to prevent copyright infringement by making it illegal to break a digital lock (meaning bypass software restrictions put on a smart device). Companies have been making their devices smart partially to use this law to prevent people from modifying their products. | ||
==The Unlocking Technology Act of 2013== | ==The Unlocking Technology Act of 2013== | ||
Representatives Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), Thomas Massie (R-KY), Anna Eshoo (D-CA), and Jared Polis (D-CO) introduced this bill to allow people to break digital locks on devices they purchased as long as it was not intended for copyright infringement. If passed, this law would have allowed for jailbreaking, servicing vehicles, ripping CDs, and more. <ref>{{Cite web |last=Lee |first=Timothy |date=2013-05-09 |title=Members of Congress finally introduce serious DMCA reform |url=https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/05/members-of-congress-finally-introduce-serious-dmca-reform/ |url-status=live |access-date=2026-02-24 |website=Ars Technica}}</ref> The | Representatives Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), Thomas Massie (R-KY), Anna Eshoo (D-CA), and Jared Polis (D-CO) introduced this bill to allow people to break digital locks on devices they purchased as long as it was not intended for copyright infringement. If passed, this law would have allowed for jailbreaking, servicing vehicles, ripping CDs, and more. <ref>{{Cite web |last=Lee |first=Timothy |date=2013-05-09 |title=Members of Congress finally introduce serious DMCA reform |url=https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/05/members-of-congress-finally-introduce-serious-dmca-reform/ |url-status=live |access-date=2026-02-24 |website=Ars Technica}}</ref> The bill was assigned to the Ways and Means Committee on May 8, 2013. That committee had done nothing on the bill by December 18, 2013, so it was reassigned to the Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet subcommittee, which also did nothing with it.<ref name=":0" /> | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
[[Category:US legislation]] | |||
Latest revision as of 21:06, 21 April 2026
❗Article Status Notice: This Article is a stub
This article is underdeveloped, and needs additional work to meet the wiki's Content Guidelines and be in line with our Mission Statement for comprehensive coverage of consumer protection issues. Learn more ▼
The Unlocking Technology Act of 2013 was a proposed bipartisan law which would have modified Section 1201 of the DMCA to only restrict breaking digital locks for the sake of copyright infringement.[1] It died in committee.[2]
Background
[edit | edit source]The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) Section 1201 was a law passed which was intended to prevent copyright infringement by making it illegal to break a digital lock (meaning bypass software restrictions put on a smart device). Companies have been making their devices smart partially to use this law to prevent people from modifying their products.
The Unlocking Technology Act of 2013
[edit | edit source]Representatives Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), Thomas Massie (R-KY), Anna Eshoo (D-CA), and Jared Polis (D-CO) introduced this bill to allow people to break digital locks on devices they purchased as long as it was not intended for copyright infringement. If passed, this law would have allowed for jailbreaking, servicing vehicles, ripping CDs, and more. [3] The bill was assigned to the Ways and Means Committee on May 8, 2013. That committee had done nothing on the bill by December 18, 2013, so it was reassigned to the Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet subcommittee, which also did nothing with it.[2]
References
[edit | edit source]- ↑ Couts, Andrew (2013-05-09). "Awesome new bill legalizes cell phone unlocking, 'fixes' the DMCA". Digital Trends. Archived from the original on 2026-02-13. Retrieved 2026-02-24.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 "H.R. 1892 (113th): Unlocking Technology Act of 2013". www.GovTrack.us. 2013. Retrieved 2016-02-24.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ↑ Lee, Timothy (2013-05-09). "Members of Congress finally introduce serious DMCA reform". Ars Technica. Retrieved 2026-02-24.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)