SquidthePlummer (talk | contribs)
added and removed incidents
m Removed cleanup tag.
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{StubNotice}}
{{StubNotice}}
{{Cleanup}}
{{CompanyCargo
{{CompanyCargo
|Founded=1898-08-28
|Founded=1898-08-28
Line 8: Line 7:
|Website=https://www.pepsico.com
|Website=https://www.pepsico.com
|Description=a company that owns products like Pepsi and Lays
|Description=a company that owns products like Pepsi and Lays
}}<!-- please expand upon this  -->[[wikipedia:PepsiCo#|PepsiCo, Inc.]], is an American food and beverage corporation.
}}


==Consumer-impact summary==
<!-- please expand upon this  -->'''{{Wplink|PepsiCo|PepsiCo, Inc.}}''' is an American food and beverage corporation.
 
==Consumer impact summary==
{{Ph-C-CIS}}
{{Ph-C-CIS}}
==Incidents==
==Incidents==
This is a list of all consumer-protection incidents this company is involved in. Any incidents not mentioned here can be found in the [[:Category:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|{{PAGENAME}} category]].
===Pepsi runs misleading advertising campaign to give away a Harrier II jet (''1996'')===
In March 1996, Pepsi began the "Pepsi Stuff" advertising campaign which claimed that you could redeem "Pepsi Points" for a variety of things including and up to a {{Wplink|Harrier jump jet#Second-generation Harriers|Harrier II jet}}. When John Leonard produced enough points to purchase the jet, they refused on the grounds that it was not intended to be taken seriously. Leonard chose to pursue a lengthy legal campaign against Pepsi for the alleged false advertising (see ''{{Wplink|Leonard v. Pepsico, Inc.}}'').
Multiple similar campaigns were performed outside of the United States, with similar results, as outlined in the ''"{{Wplink|Pepsi, Where's My Jet?}}"'' docuseries on [[Netflix]].
===PepsiCo exposes customers to lead without prior knowledge (''2006'')===
On 21 April 2006, the California state government announced that PepsiCo was agreeing to a consent judgment over claims of violating the {{Wplink|California Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act}}, alleging that Mexico Pepsi and West Jefferson Mountain Dew had failed to warn Californian consumers that their products contained lead and cadmium.<ref>{{Cite web |author= |title=Attorney General Lockyer Announces Multi-Million Dollar Settlement With Pepsi to Eliminate Lead in Mexican Bottles |url=https://oag.ca.gov/news/press-releases/attorney-general-lockyer-announces-multi-million-dollar-settlement-pepsi |website=California Department of Justice - Office of the Attorney General |date=21 Apr 2006 |access-date=16 May 2026 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120613175743/https://oag.ca.gov/news/press-releases/attorney-general-lockyer-announces-multi-million-dollar-settlement-pepsi |archive-date=13 Jun 2012}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Lockyer |first=Bill |title=''People Of The State Of Ca et al v. Pepsico Inc'', Case No. BC351120 |url=https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/media/prop65-people-pepsi-071806.pdf |website=California Department of Justice - Office of the Attorney General |date=18 July 2006 |access-date=16 May 2026 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20251217040503if_/https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/media/prop65-people-pepsi-071806.pdf |archive-date=17 Dec 2025 |format=PDF}}</ref>
[[File:PepsiCo pep+ program strategy.png|thumb|PepsiCo pep+ program strategy]]
===Hiding how much carcinogenic food coloring in products (''2014—2016'')===
Thamar Santisteban Cortina separately sued Pepsico and Goya Foods in January 2014 over the products Pepsi, Pepsi One, and Diet Pepsi, allegedly containing excessive amount of 4-methylimidazole (which can cause severe health risks like cancer) without properly informing consumers.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Clark |first=Simon |title=Pepsi, Goya Accused of Hiding Levels of Potentially Dangerous Caramel Color |url=https://www.classaction.org/blog/pepsi-goya-accused-of-hiding-levels-of-potentially-dangerous-caramel-color |website=Classaction |date=27 Jun 2017 |access-date=5 Mar 2026 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260321184924/https://www.classaction.org/blog/pepsi-goya-accused-of-hiding-levels-of-potentially-dangerous-caramel-color |archive-date=21 Mar 2026}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Antell |first=Amanda |title=Class Action Says Pepsi, Malta Goya Contain Cancer-Causing Chemical |url=https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/lawsuit-news/class-action-says-pepsi-malta-goya-contain-cancer-causing-chemical/ |website=Top Class Actions |date=29 Jan 2014 |access-date=5 Mar 2026 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260321184935/https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/lawsuit-news/class-action-says-pepsi-malta-goya-contain-cancer-causing-chemical/ |archive-date=21 Mar 2026}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Warmerdam |first=Elizabeth |title=Class Claims Pepsi Contains Carcinogen |url=https://www.courthousenews.com/class-claims-pepsi-contains-carcinogen/ |website=Courthouse News Service |date=28 Jan 2014 |access-date=5 Mar 2026 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260321184942/https://www.courthousenews.com/class-claims-pepsi-contains-carcinogen/ |archive-date=21 Mar 2026}}</ref>


PepsiCo's motion for a change of venue to the Northern District of California (from Southern) was granted 30 April 2014.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Miller |first=Jeffrey T.  |title=''Cortina v. Pepsico, Inc.'' (3:14-cv-00168) |url=https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/2582104/Cortina_v_Pepsico,_Inc |website=PacerMonitor |date=30 Apr 2014 |access-date=16 May 2026 |url-status=live
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260517060056/https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/2582104/Cortina_v_Pepsico,_Inc |archive-date=17 May 2026}}</ref> It was consolidated with ''Sciortino v. Pepsico, Inc.'' on 20 June 2014.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Chen |first=Edward M. |title=''Cortina v. Pepsico, Inc.'' (4:14-cv-02023) |url=https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/3477660/Cortina_v_Pepsico,_Inc |website=PacerMonitor |date=20 Jun 2014 |access-date=16 May 2026 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/N82Z3 |archive-date=17 May 2026}}</ref> A class action settlement was granted final approval on 30 August 2016.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Chen |first=Edward M. |title=''Sciortino v. Pepsico, Inc.'' (3:14-cv-00478) |url=https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4180619/162/sciortino-v-pepsico-inc/ |website=Court Listener |date=30 Aug 2016 |access-date=16 May 2026 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260517063507/https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4180619/162/sciortino-v-pepsico-inc/ |archive-date=17 May 2026}}</ref>


This is a list of all consumer-protection incidents this company is involved in. Any incidents not mentioned here can be found in the [[:Category:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|{{PAGENAME}} category]].
===PepsiCo and Walmart sued by FTC for rigging soft drink prices (''2025'')===
===Hiding how much methamphetamine in products===
On 17 January 2025, the [[Federal Trade Commission]] filed a lawsuit against PepsiCo and [[Walmart]] for violating the {{Wplink|Robinson-Patman Act}} by allegedly allowing Walmart to sell Pepsi products at lower prices than its competitors.<ref>{{Cite web |author= |title=FTC Sues PepsiCo for Rigging Soft Drink Competition |url=https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2025/01/ftc-sues-pepsico-rigging-soft-drink-competition |website=[[Federal Trade Commission]] |date=17 Jan 2025 |access-date=16 May 2026 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250117172226/https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2025/01/ftc-sues-pepsico-rigging-soft-drink-competition |archive-date=17 Jan 2025}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Schweizer |first=Errol |title=How Walmart And Pepsico Rigged Prices And Supercharged Food Inflation |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/errolschweizer/2025/12/18/how-walmart-and-pepsico-rigged-prices-and-supercharged-food-inflation/ |website=Forbes |date=18 Dec 2025 |access-date=5 Mar 2026 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260321184951/https://www.forbes.com/sites/errolschweizer/2025/12/18/how-walmart-and-pepsico-rigged-prices-and-supercharged-food-inflation/ |archive-date=21 Mar 2026}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Wood |first=James R. |title=Walmart, Pepsi accused of manipulating prices |url=https://www.consumeraffairs.com/news/walmart-pepsi-accused-of-manipulating-prices-121725.html |website=Consumer Affairs |date=17 Dec 2025 |access-date=21 Mar 2026 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260216144259/https://www.consumeraffairs.com/news/walmart-pepsi-accused-of-manipulating-prices-121725.html |archive-date=16 Feb 2026}}</ref>
[[File:Pepsico Twitter Post.png|thumb|Pepsico Twitter Post]]


===<!--please check over all incident and add anything missing, several things are missing-->===
The lawsuit was dismissed without prejudice by the FTC in a 3-0 vote on 22 May 2025, with FTC Chairman Andrew Ferguson reasoning that "the Biden-Harris FTC rushed to authorize this case just three days before President Trump's inauguration in a nakedly political effort to commit this administration to pursuing little more than a hunch that Pepsi had violated the law."<ref>{{Cite web |author= |title=FTC Dismisses Lawsuit Against PepsiCo |url=https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2025/05/ftc-dismisses-lawsuit-against-pepsico |website=Federal Trade Commission |date=22 May 2025 |access-date=16 May 2026 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250523013634/https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2025/05/ftc-dismisses-lawsuit-against-pepsico |archive-date=23 May 2025}}</ref>
Thamar Santisteban Cortina sued Pepsico and Goya Foods in January 2014 over the product Pepsi, Pepsi One, and Diet Pepsi, containing excessive amount of 4-methylimidazole (which can cause severe health risks like cancer) without properly informing consumers. <ref>{{Cite web |last=Clark |first=Simon |date=2017-06-27 |title=Pepsi, Goya Accused of Hiding Levels of Potentially Dangerous Caramel Color |url=https://www.classaction.org/blog/pepsi-goya-accused-of-hiding-levels-of-potentially-dangerous-caramel-color |url-status=live |access-date=2026-03-05 |website=Classaction}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Antell |first=Amanda |date=2014-01-29 |title=Class Action Says Pepsi, Malta Goya Contain Cancer-Causing Chemical |url=https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/lawsuit-news/class-action-says-pepsi-malta-goya-contain-cancer-causing-chemical/ |url-status=live |access-date=2026-03-05 |website=Top Class Actions}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Warmerdam |first=Elizabeth |date=2014-01-28 |title=Class Claims Pepsi Contains Carcinogen |url=https://www.courthousenews.com/class-claims-pepsi-contains-carcinogen/ |url-status=live |access-date=2026-03-05 |website=Courthouse News Service}}</ref>


===Pepsico in Collaboration with Walmart Rigged Prices===
===Lawsuit accuses PepsiCo and Coca-Cola of running campaigns lying about environmental benefits to consumers (''2024'')===
{{Main|PepsiCo sued by FTC for rigging Soft Drink Competition}}
[[File:PepsiCo post on X about ESG.png|thumb|PepsiCo post on [[X]].]]
On ---, Federal Trade Commision filed a lawsuit against Pepsico and Walmart for allegedly doing a price fixing scheme that allowed Walmart to sell Pepsi products at lower prices than its competitors. <ref>{{Cite web |last=Schweizer |first=Errol |date=18 Dec 2025 |title=How Walmart And Pepsico Rigged Prices And Supercharged Food Inflation |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/errolschweizer/2025/12/18/how-walmart-and-pepsico-rigged-prices-and-supercharged-food-inflation/ |url-status=live |access-date=2026-03-05 |website=Forbes}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Scarcella |first=Mike |date=16 December 2025 |title=PepsiCo, Walmart hit with class action over alleged price-fixing |url=https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/pepsico-walmart-hit-with-class-action-over-alleged-price-fixing-2025-12-16/ |url-status=live |access-date=2026-03-05 |website=Reuters}}</ref>
On 29 October 2024, Los Angeles County in California filed a lawsuit against PepsiCo and Coca-Cola on 2024 over misleading consumers with a disinformation campaign designed to make consumers believe that their products are environmental friendly — in particular single-use plastic bottles and the efficacy of recycling them.<ref>{{Cite web |last1=Harrison |first1=Dawyn R. |last2=Kuhn |first2=Scott |title=''Los Angeles County v PepsiCo, Inc. and The Coca-Cola Company, et al'' (Case No. 24STCV28450) |url=https://file.lacounty.gov/SDSInter/lac/1169727_FiledPlasticsComplaintAgainstPepsiCoandCoke.pdf |website=County of Los Angeles |date=29 Oct 2024 |access-date=17 May 2026 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250514013345/http://file.lacounty.gov/SDSInter/lac/1169727_FiledPlasticsComplaintAgainstPepsiCoandCoke.pdf |archive-date=14 May 2025 |format=PDF}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |author= |title=LA County Sues Pepsi and Coca-Cola over Plastic Beverage Pollution and Deceiving Public on Plastic Recycling |url=https://lacounty.gov/2024/10/30/la-county-sues-pepsi-and-coca-cola-over-plastic-beverage-pollution-and-deceiving-public-on-plastic-recycling/ |website=County of Los Angeles |date=30 Oct 2024 |access-date=17 May 2026 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241103190450/https://lacounty.gov/2024/10/30/la-county-sues-pepsi-and-coca-cola-over-plastic-beverage-pollution-and-deceiving-public-on-plastic-recycling/ |archive-date=3 Nov 2024}}</ref>
===Pepsico Exposes Lead to Customers without prior knowledge===
<ref>{{Cite web |last=Edwards |first=Jessy |title=Pepsi, Coca-Cola untruthful about about single-use plastic waste, lawsuit claims |url=https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/class-action-news/pepsi-coca-cola-untruthful-about-about-single-use-plastic-waste-lawsuit-claims |website=Top Class Actions |date=8 Nov 2024 |access-date=5 Mar 2026 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260321185527/https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/class-action-news/pepsi-coca-cola-untruthful-about-about-single-use-plastic-waste-lawsuit-claims/ |archive-date=21 Mar 2026}}</ref>
On April 21, 2006, the People of the State of California filed a lawsuit against Pepsico over violating the California Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act.  Mexico Pepsi and West Jefferson Mountain Dew failed to warn Californian consumers of their products containing lead and cadmium. <ref>{{Cite web |date=18 July 2006 |title=IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STA TE OF CALIFORNIA
FORTHECOUNTYOFLOSANGELES |url=https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/media/prop65-people-pepsi-071806.pdf |url-status=live |access-date=2026-03-04 |website=Calfifornia Department of Justice - Office of the Attorney General}}</ref>[[File:PepsiCo pep+ program strategy.png|thumb|PepsiCo pep+ program strategy]]


===Ran Campaigns Lying to Consumers about Environmental Benefits===
The case was removed from {{Wplink|Los Angeles County Superior Court|Los Angeles Superior Court}} to the {{Wplink|United States District Court for the Central District of California|Central District of California}} on 2 December 2024,<ref>{{Cite web |author= |title=''The People of the State of California v. PepsiCo, Inc.'' (2:24-cv-10340) |url=https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69430662/4/the-people-of-the-state-of-california-v-pepsico-inc/ |website=Court Listener |date=2 Dec 2024 |access-date=17 May 2026 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260517222253/https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69430662/4/the-people-of-the-state-of-california-v-pepsico-inc/ |archive-date=17 May 2026}}</ref> before eventually being remanded back to Superior Court on 14 March 2025.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Wu |first=George H. |title=''The People of the State of California v. PepsiCo, Inc.'' (2:24-cv-10340) |url=https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69430662/45/the-people-of-the-state-of-california-v-pepsico-inc/ |website=Court Listener |date=14 Mar 2025 |access-date=17 May 2026 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260517221730/https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69430662/45/the-people-of-the-state-of-california-v-pepsico-inc/ |archive-date=17 May 2026}}</ref> Its current status is unknown as of 17 May 2026.
The People of the State of California (through Los Angeles County) filed a lawsuit against Pepsico and Coca-Cola on 2024 over misleading consumers with a disinformation campaign designed to make consumers believe that their products are environmental friendly.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Edwards |first=Jessy |date=2024-11-08 |title=Pepsi, Coca-Cola untruthful about about single-use plastic waste, lawsuit claims |url=https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/class-action-news/pepsi-coca-cola-untruthful-about-about-single-use-plastic-waste-lawsuit-claims/ |url-status=live |access-date=2026-03-05 |website=Top Class Actions}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=30 October 2024 |title=SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES |url=https://cdn.climatepolicyradar.org/navigator/USA/2024/people-v-pepsico-inc_fab3e3031de5c92e5c44de4cfd71d466.pdf |url-status=live |access-date=5 March 2026 |website=climatepolicyradar}}</ref>  


==Products==
==Products==
Line 38: Line 50:
*[[Coca-Cola]]
*[[Coca-Cola]]
*[[Yum! Brands]]
*[[Yum! Brands]]
*[[Restaurant Brands International|Restaurant Brand international]]
*[[Restaurant Brands International]]


==References==
==References==
{{reflist}}
{{Reflist}}


[[Category:{{PAGENAME}}]]
[[Category:{{PAGENAME}}]]
[[Category:Food and drink companies]]