Filmora lifetime licenses terminated: Difference between revisions
m →Wondershare's response: Remove extraneous empty template argument |
m →Lawsuit |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Incomplete|Issue 1=Cargo fields need filling out.}} | |||
{{Cleanup}} | |||
{{IncidentCargo | {{IncidentCargo | ||
|Company=Wondershare | |Company=Wondershare | ||
| Line 24: | Line 26: | ||
==Lawsuit== | ==Lawsuit== | ||
In February 2024, there was a related | In February 2024, there was a related {{Wplink|class action}} lawsuit filed, alleging that Wondershare lures consumers into automatically renewing subscriptions without making proper disclosures or obtaining customer consent.<ref>{{Cite web |last=McCroskey |first=Kelsey |date=26 February 2024 |title=Wondershare Hit with Lawsuit Over Alleged Subscription Auto-Renewal Practices |url=https://www.classaction.org/news/wondershare-hit-with-lawsuit-over-alleged-subscription-auto-renewal-practices |access-date=1 Mar 2025 |website=ClassAction.org |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20250803120045/https://www.classaction.org/news/wondershare-hit-with-lawsuit-over-alleged-subscription-auto-renewal-practices |archive-date=3 Aug 2025}}</ref><ref>https://dockets.justia.com/docket/california/cacdce/2:2024cv01314/915366 ([http://web.archive.org/web/20250708172903/https://dockets.justia.com/docket/california/cacdce/2:2024cv01314/915366 Archived])</ref> The court order established a 90-day window for settlement negotiations, and the case was dismissed subject to settlement consummation.<ref>https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/california/cacdce/2:2024cv01314/915366/42 ([http://web.archive.org/web/20250708172901/https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/california/cacdce/2:2024cv01314/915366/42 Archived])</ref> | ||
The complaint alleged that Wondershare engaged in "misleading, false, unfair, and deceptive" practices, with customers seeking refunds and damages.<ref>{{Cite web |date=21 Feb 2024 |title=Plaintiff Sues Software Editing Firm for Violating Calif. Automatic Renewal Law |url=https://communicationslitigationtoday.com/article/2024/02/21/plaintiff-sues-software-editing-firm-for-violating-calif-automatic-renewal-law-2402200028 |access-date=1 Mar 2025 |website=Communications Litigation Today |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20251019021748/https://communicationslitigationtoday.com/article/2024/02/21/plaintiff-sues-software-editing-firm-for-violating-calif-automatic-renewal-law-2402200028 |archive-date=19 Oct 2025}}</ref> | The complaint alleged that Wondershare engaged in "misleading, false, unfair, and deceptive" practices, with customers seeking refunds and damages.<ref>{{Cite web |date=21 Feb 2024 |title=Plaintiff Sues Software Editing Firm for Violating Calif. Automatic Renewal Law |url=https://communicationslitigationtoday.com/article/2024/02/21/plaintiff-sues-software-editing-firm-for-violating-calif-automatic-renewal-law-2402200028 |access-date=1 Mar 2025 |website=Communications Litigation Today |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20251019021748/https://communicationslitigationtoday.com/article/2024/02/21/plaintiff-sues-software-editing-firm-for-violating-calif-automatic-renewal-law-2402200028 |archive-date=19 Oct 2025}}</ref> | ||
| Line 44: | Line 46: | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{Reflist}} | |||
[[Category:Filmora]] | [[Category:Filmora]] | ||
[[Category:Articles based on videos]] | [[Category:Articles based on videos]] | ||