Rudxain
Joined 12 September 2025
link to my OTM |
link my permacomputing page |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
You might also be interested in my | You might also be interested in my | ||
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20260420215524/https://github.com/Rudxain/RX-wiki/blob/main/wiki/Crap_inhibitors.md "Crap inhibitors" article] (archived, because [https://github.com/Rudxain/Rudxain.github.io/issues/17 this]) | *[https://web.archive.org/web/20260420215524/https://github.com/Rudxain/RX-wiki/blob/main/wiki/Crap_inhibitors.md "Crap inhibitors" article] (archived, because [https://github.com/Rudxain/Rudxain.github.io/issues/17 this]) | ||
* [[User:Rudxain/Object transparency movement|Product transparency proposal]] | *[[User:Rudxain/Object transparency movement|Product transparency proposal]] | ||
*[[User:Rudxain/Permacomputing|Permacomputing page]] | |||
BTW, I believe [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md my proposal for human-friendly contracts] is relevant for the CRW (possibly [[Hidden EULA language#Resources|there]]?). See [https://discord.com/channels/1324835844812443810/1324835844812443813/1476657529999065250 this message]:<blockquote>I've posted [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md this proposal for human-friendly contracts] a while back. There's some refs/sources that can be "mined" from it, but I believe most of the proposal is relevant to the CRW, so it deserves to be mentioned in some article. I'm asking because there's many articles where it could be referenced, so I'm not sure which is more "central" or relevant. Maybe this is a sign that there should be an article about "proposals for humane terms-of-service" or something similar? I did mention (in the post) that other people tried to solve similar problems</blockquote> | BTW, I believe [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md my proposal for human-friendly contracts] is relevant for the CRW (possibly [[Hidden EULA language#Resources|there]]?). See [https://discord.com/channels/1324835844812443810/1324835844812443813/1476657529999065250 this message]:<blockquote>I've posted [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md this proposal for human-friendly contracts] a while back. There's some refs/sources that can be "mined" from it, but I believe most of the proposal is relevant to the CRW, so it deserves to be mentioned in some article. I'm asking because there's many articles where it could be referenced, so I'm not sure which is more "central" or relevant. Maybe this is a sign that there should be an article about "proposals for humane terms-of-service" or something similar? I did mention (in the post) that other people tried to solve similar problems</blockquote> | ||