m Removed left-over link.
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
|Website=https://deepcyclesystems.com.au/
|Website=https://deepcyclesystems.com.au/
}}
}}
{{Hatnote|This article is about the battery manufacturer. For other uses, see [[DCS (disambiguation)]].}}


'''Deep Cycle Systems''' (DCS) is an Australian manufacturer of lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries for off-road, marine, solar, & recreational vehicle use. The company is notable for suing independent YouTuber Stephan Fischer for [[defamation]] after he published reviews documenting battery degradation & misleading warranty changes; the District Court of Queensland ruled that DCS had no standing to bring the claim.<ref name="judgment">{{Cite web |author=Byrne KC DCJ |title=Deep Cycle Systems Pty Ltd v Fischer [2025] QDC 25 |url=https://www.queenslandjudgments.com.au/caselaw/qdc/2025/25 |website=Queensland Judgments |date=11 Mar 2025 |access-date=28 Mar 2026}}</ref> Independent testing by the ARENA-funded Canberra Battery Test Centre found a DCS battery dropped to 57% state of health after roughly 1,100 cycles.<ref name="arena">{{Cite web |author=ARENA |title=Public Report 12 (Final Report) - Lithium-ion Battery Testing |url=https://arena.gov.au/assets/2018/05/lithium-ion-battery-testing-public-report-12.pdf |website=ARENA |date=Mar 2022 |access-date=28 Mar 2026 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230428135852/https://arena.gov.au/assets/2018/05/lithium-ion-battery-testing-public-report-12.pdf |archive-date=28 Apr 2023 |format=pdf}}</ref>
'''Deep Cycle Systems''' (DCS) is an Australian manufacturer of lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries for off-road, marine, solar, & recreational vehicle use. The company is notable for suing independent YouTuber Stephan Fischer for [[defamation]] after he published reviews documenting battery degradation & misleading warranty changes; the District Court of Queensland ruled that DCS had no standing to bring the claim.<ref name="judgment">{{Cite web |author=Byrne KC DCJ |title=Deep Cycle Systems Pty Ltd v Fischer [2025] QDC 25 |url=https://www.queenslandjudgments.com.au/caselaw/qdc/2025/25 |website=Queensland Judgments |date=11 Mar 2025 |access-date=28 Mar 2026}}</ref> Independent testing by the ARENA-funded Canberra Battery Test Centre found a DCS battery dropped to 57% state of health after roughly 1,100 cycles.<ref name="arena">{{Cite web |author=ARENA |title=Public Report 12 (Final Report) - Lithium-ion Battery Testing |url=https://arena.gov.au/assets/2018/05/lithium-ion-battery-testing-public-report-12.pdf |website=ARENA |date=Mar 2022 |access-date=28 Mar 2026 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230428135852/https://arena.gov.au/assets/2018/05/lithium-ion-battery-testing-public-report-12.pdf |archive-date=28 Apr 2023 |format=pdf}}</ref>
Line 26: Line 24:


===Defamation lawsuit against YouTuber===
===Defamation lawsuit against YouTuber===
{{Main|DCS sues small YouTuber for accurate product review showing battery issues & misleading warranty}}
{{Main|DCS sues small YouTuber for accurate review}}


On 2 May 2024, DCS filed a defamation lawsuit against Stephan Fischer, the creator of AllOffroad 4x4 Adventures TV, in the District Court of Queensland. Fischer had published video reviews between August & December 2023 documenting battery degradation & warranty discrepancies.<ref name="judgment" /> The District Court ruled against DCS on 11 March 2025, finding that DCS was not an "excluded corporation" under section 9 of the ''Defamation Act 2005'' (Qld) & therefore had no standing to sue for defamation. The court found DCS failed on both the employee count test & the associated entity test, citing financial intermingling between DCS & Energy Tech Electronics.<ref name="judgment" />
On 2 May 2024, DCS filed a defamation lawsuit against Stephan Fischer, the creator of AllOffroad 4x4 Adventures TV, in the District Court of Queensland. Fischer had published video reviews between August & December 2023 documenting battery degradation & warranty discrepancies.<ref name="judgment" /> The District Court ruled against DCS on 11 March 2025, finding that DCS was not an "excluded corporation" under section 9 of the ''Defamation Act 2005'' (Qld) & therefore had no standing to sue for defamation. The court found DCS failed on both the employee count test & the associated entity test, citing financial intermingling between DCS & Energy Tech Electronics.<ref name="judgment" />