Splice: Difference between revisions
Added clean-up tag; did what I could to separate CIS and Incident info; removed Wikipedia ref and replaced it with a Wplink. |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{CompanyCargo | {{CompanyCargo | ||
|Founded=2013 | |Founded=2013 | ||
| Line 28: | Line 27: | ||
After cancelling a subscription, users also lose the ability to load new tracks using premium Splice Instrument presets, and cannot re-download that content if it is deleted from their system.<ref name="splice-cancel-plan">{{cite web |title=How do I cancel my Splice plan? |url=https://support.splice.com/en/articles/8652611-how-do-i-cancel-my-splice-plan |website=Splice Help Center |access-date=2026-05-16}}</ref> | After cancelling a subscription, users also lose the ability to load new tracks using premium Splice Instrument presets, and cannot re-download that content if it is deleted from their system.<ref name="splice-cancel-plan">{{cite web |title=How do I cancel my Splice plan? |url=https://support.splice.com/en/articles/8652611-how-do-i-cancel-my-splice-plan |website=Splice Help Center |access-date=2026-05-16}}</ref> | ||
==="Sounds are licensed, not sold"=== | |||
Splice's terms of service explicitly state that "sounds are licensed, not sold, to you."<ref name="splice-tos" /> While Splice grants users a perpetual right to use downloaded sounds within completed musical works, the licence is non-exclusive and non-transferable. The app licence itself is described in Splice's terms as "limited, non-exclusive, non-transferable, non-sublicensable, [and] revocable."<ref name="splice-tos" /> | |||
The terms additionally allow Splice to "manage, regulate, change, or remove Virtual Items at any time at our sole discretion," and grant Splice the unilateral right to assign these terms without user consent.<ref name="splice-tos" /> This structure means users hold no ownership over the credits or digital goods they purchase, and limits their recourse in the event that Splice alters terms, removes content, or terminates accounts. | |||
===Automatic subscription renewals and cancellation difficulties=== | |||
The BBB has documented multiple complaints involving [[Negative option marketing|automatic billing following free trial periods]], with users stating they did not receive clear notification of the transition to a paid subscription.<ref name="bbb" /> Several complaints describe difficulty cancelling due to inconsistent account states across devices, where the web interface and desktop application displayed conflicting subscription information simultaneously.<ref name="bbb" /> Splice does not offer telephone support for billing disputes.<ref name="donotpay">{{cite web |title=How to Cancel Splice Subscription |url=https://donotpay.com/learn/how-to-cancel-splice-subscription/ |access-date=2026-05-16 |website=DoNotPay}}</ref> | |||
==Incidents== | ==Incidents== | ||
| Line 45: | Line 52: | ||
The incident received coverage from Techdirt and MusicTech, among other outlets.<ref name="techdirt" /><ref name="musictech">{{cite web |title=Splice responds to Top Music Attorney copyright strike: "We fundamentally support the rights of creators to express themselves" |url=https://musictech.com/news/music/splice-issues-copyright-strike-to-content-creator-internet-reacts |website=MusicTech |date=2024-07-17 |access-date=2026-05-16}}</ref> Consumer rights advocate Louis Rossmann also covered the event.<ref name="rossmann">{{cite web |title=Louis Rossmann Reacted To My Copyright Strike From Splice |url=https://management7.podbean.com/e/louis-rossmann-reacted-to-my-copyright-strike-from-splice |website=Top Music Attorney Podcast |date=2024-08-02 |access-date=2026-05-16}}</ref> Splice subsequently removed the copyright strike and issued a statement that it "fundamentally supports the rights of creators to express themselves."<ref name="musictech" /> The incident drew additional public scrutiny to Splice's contractual terms, including provisions on credit retention upon account termination and the scope of rights users grant to Splice over their own uploaded audio content. | The incident received coverage from Techdirt and MusicTech, among other outlets.<ref name="techdirt" /><ref name="musictech">{{cite web |title=Splice responds to Top Music Attorney copyright strike: "We fundamentally support the rights of creators to express themselves" |url=https://musictech.com/news/music/splice-issues-copyright-strike-to-content-creator-internet-reacts |website=MusicTech |date=2024-07-17 |access-date=2026-05-16}}</ref> Consumer rights advocate Louis Rossmann also covered the event.<ref name="rossmann">{{cite web |title=Louis Rossmann Reacted To My Copyright Strike From Splice |url=https://management7.podbean.com/e/louis-rossmann-reacted-to-my-copyright-strike-from-splice |website=Top Music Attorney Podcast |date=2024-08-02 |access-date=2026-05-16}}</ref> Splice subsequently removed the copyright strike and issued a statement that it "fundamentally supports the rights of creators to express themselves."<ref name="musictech" /> The incident drew additional public scrutiny to Splice's contractual terms, including provisions on credit retention upon account termination and the scope of rights users grant to Splice over their own uploaded audio content. | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||