User talk:Louis/Dragonfly Energy trade libel suit Will Prowse: Difference between revisions
Jackalgirl (talk | contribs) |
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== Review of ULs certifications? == | == Review of ULs certifications? == | ||
One thing that might be tangential to the core of this specific topic, yet potentially even more worrying is that these batteries are sold and marketed as UL Listed. If this is really the case, how can they display such major flaws during normal use? | One thing that might be tangential to the core of this specific topic, yet potentially even more worrying is that these batteries are sold and marketed as UL Listed. If this is really the case, how can they display such major flaws during normal use? | ||
If they are indeed UL Listed as branded? I can not find any UL Listing for Battle Born batteries over at https://productiq.ulprospector.com/en/search?term=Battle%20Born&page=1 | If they are indeed UL Listed as branded? I can not find any UL Listing for Battle Born batteries over at https://productiq.ulprospector.com/en/search?term=Battle%20Born&page=1 {{Unsigned|2001:9b1:30ff:1900:dd77:7b4e:3f41:ee8a|05:17, 8 June 2026 (UTC)}} | ||
== 100 AH (BB10012) vs 75 AH (BB1275) == | == 100 AH (BB10012) vs 75 AH (BB1275) == | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
== UL Listed/Certified == | == UL Listed/Certified == | ||
I'm only doing a really cursory search, but I don't see any of the UL Listed or Certified marks on the battery (as imaged here on 8 June 2026: https://battlebornbatteries.com/products/100ah-12v-lifepo4-deep-cycle-battery -- I haven't fully read through the filing yet, but if they are claiming that the batteries are UL Listed, it's curious that the actual UL Listed mark doesn't appear to be on the battery (the BB10012 at least), and isn't showing up in the listing registry. I *think* they're only claiming that the batteries are made "...to UL 2054...standards", which is a different thing than claiming to be actually certified or listed (I think). | I'm only doing a really cursory search, but I don't see any of the UL Listed or Certified marks on the battery (as imaged here on 8 June 2026: https://battlebornbatteries.com/products/100ah-12v-lifepo4-deep-cycle-battery ) -- I haven't fully read through the filing yet, but if they are claiming that the batteries are UL Listed, it's curious that the actual UL Listed mark doesn't appear to be on the battery (the BB10012 at least), and isn't showing up in the listing registry. I *think* they're only claiming that the batteries are made "...to UL 2054...standards", which is a different thing than claiming to be actually certified or listed (I think). | ||
I *do* see a mark for LC -- the image is blurry, but it looks like the "c LC US" mark described here: https://labtestcert.com/marks-labels/ | I *do* see a mark for LC -- the image is blurry, but it looks like the "c LC US" mark described here: https://labtestcert.com/marks-labels/ | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
The "UN38.3" mark has to do with the item being a lithium batter certified as being safe for transporation: https://www.intertek.com/batteries/un-38-3-testing/ [[User:Jackalgirl|Jackalgirl]] ([[User talk:Jackalgirl|talk]]) 22:33, 8 June 2026 (UTC) | The "UN38.3" mark has to do with the item being a lithium batter certified as being safe for transporation: https://www.intertek.com/batteries/un-38-3-testing/ [[User:Jackalgirl|Jackalgirl]] ([[User talk:Jackalgirl|talk]]) 22:33, 8 June 2026 (UTC) | ||
== Updated documentation's author's email and creation date are attached to the PDF == | |||
A funny detail I noticed is that if you view the metadata of the updated documentation PDF, it says it was created by <code>[email protected]</code> on 2026-06-01 20:38:36 UTC. The previous file was created on 2024-12-30 23:43:34 UTC and does not have an author attached. [[User:Je|Je]] ([[User talk:Je|talk]]) 00:40, 9 June 2026 (UTC) | |||