Anti-privacy legislation: Difference between revisions
→List of Legislation: Add Chat Control (EU) |
→List of Legislation: Added on table the Chilean bill 16431-15, and updates on safe digital environments plan |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 515: | Line 515: | ||
|[[Safe Digital Environments Law]] (Ley de Entornos Digitales Seguros) | |[[Safe Digital Environments Law]] (Ley de Entornos Digitales Seguros) | ||
|Chile | |Chile | ||
|This project looks to follow practices as the ones that have been taking effect in Europe and Australia, to ban users under 16 from social media. It mandates to add age verification methods | |This project looks to follow practices as the ones that have been taking effect in Europe and Australia, to ban users under 16 from social media. It mandates to add age verification methods using Chilean digital ID (Clave Única) for social media sites to prevent underage users to access them | ||
|Age Verification/Censorship | |Age Verification/Censorship | ||
|Introduced | |Proposed | ||
|- | |||
|[https://tramitacion.senado.cl/appsenado/templates/tramitacion/index.php?boletin_ini=16431-15 Bill 16431-15] | |||
|Chile | |||
|Modifies Law N° 18,168 to mandate network providers to add age verification methods to prevent minors to access to explicit sexual content | |||
|Age Verification/Censorship | |||
|Introduced on November 21st, 2023 | |||
|- | |- | ||
|Anti-Terror-Paket (Anti terrorism package) | |Anti-Terror-Paket (Anti terrorism package) | ||
| Line 527: | Line 533: | ||
|Chat Control | |Chat Control | ||
|EU | |EU | ||
|Messengers have to have a built-in backdoor to allow scanning of messages. If suspicious content is found (likely by means of a proprietary software), the content is sent to an institution which is not under court oversight. Introduced based on lobbying by a U.S. non-profit called Thorn | |Messengers have to have a built-in backdoor to allow scanning of messages. If suspicious content is found (likely by means of a proprietary software), the content is sent to an institution which is not under court oversight.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Fight Chat Control |url=https://fightchatcontrol.eu/ |access-date=2026-06-02 |website=Fight Chat Control}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Stop Chat Control |url=https://stopchatcontrol.eu/}}</ref> Introduced based on lobbying by a U.S. non-profit called Thorn, a vendor of such scanning software. <ref>{{Cite web |last=Krempl |first=Stefan |date=2023-08-27 |title=Lobbygeflecht bei Chatkontrolle: "Schlimmste Befürchtungen bestätigt" (Lobby Entanglements around Chat Control: "Worst Suspicions Confirmed") |url=https://www.heise.de/news/Lobbygeflecht-bei-Chatkontrolle-Schlimmste-Befuerchtungen-bestaetigt-9318337.html |access-date=2026-07-03 |website=Heise Online}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Breyer |first=Patrick |date=2025-02-25 |title=Chat control: EU Ombudsman criticises revolving door between Europol and chat control tech lobbyist Thorn |url=https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/chat-control-eu-ombudsman-criticises-revolving-door-between-europol-and-chat-control-tech-lobbyist-thorn/ |access-date=2026-07-03 |website=Patrick Breyer - Digitaler Freiheitskämpfer}}</ref> | ||
|Anti-Encryption, Surveillance | |Anti-Encryption, Surveillance | ||
|Rejected by EU parlament on multiple occasions, but keeps getting re-introduced | |Rejected by EU parlament on multiple occasions, but keeps getting re-introduced | ||