Mozilla introduces TOS to Firefox: Difference between revisions

Line 1:

https://blog.mozilla.org/en/products/firefox/firefox-news/firefox-terms-of-use/~~<nowiki/>{{Placeholder box|~~Mozilla Firefox claims to be open source in their opening line of their Terms of Use "Firefox is free and open source web browser software, built by a community of thousands from all over the world"

{{Incomplete|Issue 1= This article uses "open source" improperly. Firefox is demonstrably open-source.}}

https://blog.mozilla.org/en/products/firefox/firefox-news/firefox-terms-of-use/

Mozilla Firefox claims to be open source in their opening line of their Terms of Use "Firefox is free and open source web browser software, built by a community of thousands from all over the world"

In the same vein, Mozilla also changed their ToU and PS to include a statement that says

Line 8:

Line 13:

"You give Mozilla all rights necessary to operate Firefox, including processing data as we describe in the Firefox Privacy Notice, as well as acting on your behalf to help you navigate the internet. When you upload or input information through Firefox, you hereby grant us a nonexclusive, royalty-free, worldwide license to use that information to help you navigate, experience, and interact with online content as you indicate with your use of Firefox."

Mozilla is saying two things that mean the opposite.}}

Mozilla is saying two things that mean the opposite.

$1

~~==Background==~~

~~{{Placeholder box|Information about the product/service history to provide the necessary context surrounding the incident}}~~

$2

~~==[Incident]==~~

~~{{Placeholder box|Change this section's title to be descriptive of the incident.~~

~~Impartial and complete description of the events, including actions taken by the company, and the timeline of the incident coming to the public's attention.}}~~

~~===[Company]'s response===~~

~~{{Placeholder box|If applicable, add the proposed solution to the issues by the company.}}~~

~~==Lawsuit==~~

~~{{Placeholder box|If applicable, add any information regarding litigation around the incident here.~~

~~===Claims===~~

~~Main claims of the suit.~~

~~===Rebuttal===~~

~~The response of the company or counterclaims.~~

~~===Outcome===~~

~~The outcome of the suit, if any.}}~~

~~==Consumer response==~~

~~{{Placeholder box|Summary and key issues of prevailing sentiment from the consumers and commentators that can be documented via articles, emails to support, reviews and forum posts.}}~~

~~==References==~~

~~{{reflist}}~~

{{Placeholder box|[[mw:Help:VisualEditor/User_guide#Editing_categories|Add a category]] with the same name as the product, service, website, software, product line or company that this article is about.

~~The "Incidents" category is not needed.}}~~

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-https://blog.mozilla.org/en/products/firefox/firefox-news/firefox-terms-of-use/<nowiki/>{{Placeholder box|Mozilla Firefox claims to be open source in their opening line of their Terms of Use "Firefox is free and open source web browser software, built by a community of thousands from all over the world"
+{{StubNotice}}
+{{Incomplete|Issue 1= This article uses "open source" improperly. Firefox is demonstrably open-source.}}
+https://blog.mozilla.org/en/products/firefox/firefox-news/firefox-terms-of-use/
+Mozilla Firefox claims to be open source in their opening line of their Terms of Use "Firefox is free and open source web browser software, built by a community of thousands from all over the world"
 In the same vein, Mozilla also changed their ToU and PS to include a statement that says
@@ Line 8: / Line 13: @@
 "You give Mozilla all rights necessary to operate Firefox, including processing data as we describe in the Firefox Privacy Notice, as well as acting on your behalf to help you navigate the internet. When you upload or input information through Firefox, you hereby grant us a nonexclusive, royalty-free, worldwide license to use that information to help you navigate, experience, and interact with online content as you indicate with your use of Firefox."
-Mozilla is saying two things that mean the opposite.}}
+Mozilla is saying two things that mean the opposite.
-$1
-==Background==
-{{Placeholder box|Information about the product/service history to provide the necessary context surrounding the incident}}
-$2
-==[Incident]==
-{{Placeholder box|Change this section's title to be descriptive of the incident.
-Impartial and complete description of the events, including actions taken by the company, and the timeline of the incident coming to the public's attention.}}
-===[Company]'s response===
-{{Placeholder box|If applicable, add the proposed solution to the issues by the company.}}
-==Lawsuit==
-{{Placeholder box|If applicable, add any information regarding litigation around the incident here.
-===Claims===
-Main claims of the suit.
-===Rebuttal===
-The response of the company or counterclaims.
-===Outcome===
-The outcome of the suit, if any.}}
-==Consumer response==
-{{Placeholder box|Summary and key issues of prevailing sentiment from the consumers and commentators that can be documented via articles, emails to support, reviews and forum posts.}}
-==References==
-{{reflist}}
-{{Placeholder box|[[mw:Help:VisualEditor/User_guide#Editing_categories|Add a category]] with the same name as the product, service, website, software, product line or company that this article is about.
-The "Incidents" category is not needed.}}