Forced arbitration with Smartwool socks: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
→Background: Fixed typo. |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Smartwool is an American clothing company specializing in of wool clothing. The incident described in this article is a example of [[Post-purchase EULA modification| post-purchase EULA (End User License Agreement) modification]] (colloquially referred to as "EULA roofieing") that includes a revised [[Forced arbitration|forced arbitration clause]]. To illustrate the magnitude of risk posed by a clothing-related EULA, one can imagine a less responsible company accidentally including toxic dyes or coatings due to supply chain mishaps. In such a case they might avoid paying damages to the harmed consumers. | Smartwool is an American clothing company specializing in of wool clothing. The incident described in this article is a example of [[Post-purchase EULA modification| post-purchase EULA (End User License Agreement) modification]] (colloquially referred to as "EULA roofieing") that includes a revised [[Forced arbitration|forced arbitration clause]]. To illustrate the magnitude of risk posed by a clothing-related EULA, one can imagine a less responsible company accidentally including toxic dyes or coatings due to supply chain mishaps. In such a case they might avoid paying damages to the harmed consumers. | ||
This instance of post- | This instance of post-purchase EULA modification is a very good example of the strategic use of asymmetry. The business delivered their opt-in in a inexpensive, unexpected, and casual nature. The consumer has to do absolutely nothing to opt-in, and they can opt-in without reading it. Opting out is difficult, tedious and relatively expensive. | ||
==Post-purchase EULA modification== | ==Post-purchase EULA modification== |