Consumer Rights Wiki:AI usage policy: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
*Overuse of bolding or bulletpoints | *Overuse of bolding or bulletpoints | ||
*A generally 'fluffy' and non human-like writing style, often including an unnecessary number of similes and other comparatives | *A generally 'fluffy' and non human-like writing style, often including an unnecessary number of similes and other comparatives | ||
*Sources being shown in parentheses without a website address (ex: "This company violates consumer rights. (The Verge)") | |||
This being said, be careful not to be overzealous when approaching articles which seem like edge-cases. An emdash or two is not the end of the world, and they're a major part of the writing style of Wikipedia, so expect to see people using them. At the end of the day, the quality of the writing is the most important thing – if it reads like a low-quality listicle, that's a very good sign that there has been excessive AI usage. | This being said, be careful not to be overzealous when approaching articles which seem like edge-cases. An emdash or two is not the end of the world, and they're a major part of the writing style of Wikipedia, so expect to see people using them. At the end of the day, the quality of the writing is the most important thing – if it reads like a low-quality listicle, that's a very good sign that there has been excessive AI usage. | ||
[[Category:CRW]] | [[Category:CRW]] | ||