Reverse engineering vs illegal hacking: Difference between revisions
m Keith moved page Reverse Engineering vs Illegal Hacking to Reverse engineering vs illegal hacking: Sentence case |
illegaly > illegally |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Companies often exploit this confusion to suppress ownership rights, discourage commonplace repair, and interrupt interoperability under the guise of protecting security or intellectual property. The following information will clarify legal distinctions, correct the narrative, and explain why reverse engineering your own device to restore or preserve its functionality is not, and should never be deemed, a crime. | Companies often exploit this confusion to suppress ownership rights, discourage commonplace repair, and interrupt interoperability under the guise of protecting security or intellectual property. The following information will clarify legal distinctions, correct the narrative, and explain why reverse engineering your own device to restore or preserve its functionality is not, and should never be deemed, a crime. | ||
In this article, "hack" or "illegal hacking" is used interchangeably for | In this article, "hack" or "illegal hacking" is used interchangeably for illegally hacking, or "to get into someone else's computer system without permission in order to do something illegal" ([https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/hack#cald4-1-3 Hack | Cambridge Dictionary]). This should not be confused with the slang "hack" that describe the act of tinkering or modifying a device (like "a hackable laptop"). | ||
==What section 1201 is for== | ==What section 1201 is for== |