Jump to content

Brother printers causing issues with third party inks: Difference between revisions

From Consumer Rights Wiki
AirborneBandit (talk | contribs)
m Minor wording changes, added a citation as requested. Lmk if it needs some more wording work.
Burt79 (talk | contribs)
m Removed unnecessary bold lettering throughout. Minor changes elsewhere.
Line 1: Line 1:
{{IncidentCargo
| Company    = Brother Industries Ltd.
| Type        = Digital restrictions,Firmware lockout
| StartDate  = 2025
| Description = Brother pushed firmware updates that degrade non-OEM toner's print quality - forcing consumers to buy more expensive genuine Brother toner
| Status      = Active
| ProductLine =
| ArticleType = Product
| Product    =
}}
{{ToneWarning}}
{{ToneWarning}}
[[Brother Industries Ltd.|Brother]] has a reputation for allowing the use of third-party toner and being more consumer friendly than competing printer companies, such as [[HP]]. In recent years, they've implemented firmware updates that deliberately lower print quality when using toner that is not from the original equipment manufacturer (OEM). These updates disable colour registration & other features, encouraging the use of toner manufactured by Brother over other toner options<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |last=Jacobs |first=Skye |date=2025-03-05 |title=Brother printers are quietly sabotaging third-party toner with firmware updates |url=https://www.techspot.com/news/107022-brother-printers-quietly-sabotaging-third-party-toner-firmware.html}}</ref>.
[[Brother Industries Ltd.|Brother]] has a reputation for allowing the use of third-party toner and being more consumer friendly than competing printer companies, such as [[HP]]. In recent years, they've implemented firmware updates that deliberately lower print quality when using toner that is not from the original equipment manufacturer (OEM). These updates disable color registration & other features, encouraging the use of toner manufactured by Brother over other toner options<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |last=Jacobs |first=Skye |date=2025-03-05 |title=Brother printers are quietly sabotaging third-party toner with firmware updates |url=https://www.techspot.com/news/107022-brother-printers-quietly-sabotaging-third-party-toner-firmware.html}}</ref>.


==Exploitative practices==
==Exploitative practices==
*'''Post-Sale Function Removal''' – Firmware updates retroactively remove previously available features, such as automatic color registration, for users using non-OEM toner.<ref name="reddit">[https://www.reddit.com/r/printers/comments/s9b2eg Brother MFC firmware update - non-genuine toner now disables critical features.]</ref><ref name="reddit-2">[https://www.reddit.com/r/printers/comments/w60687/brother_mfcl3370cdw_firmware_downgrade_needed/ Brother MFC-L3370CDW Firmware Downgrade needed]</ref>
*'''Post-Sale Function Removal''' – Firmware updates retroactively remove previously available features, such as automatic color registration, for users using non-OEM toner.<ref name="reddit">[https://www.reddit.com/r/printers/comments/s9b2eg Brother MFC firmware update - non-genuine toner now disables critical features.]</ref><ref name="reddit-2">[https://www.reddit.com/r/printers/comments/w60687/brother_mfcl3370cdw_firmware_downgrade_needed/ Brother MFC-L3370CDW Firmware Downgrade needed]</ref>
*'''Vendor lock-in via DRM''' – Printers continue to function with third-party toner but print at lower quality unless OEM toner is installed<ref name=":0" />.
*'''Vendor lock-in via DRM''' – Printers continue to function with third-party toner but print at lower quality unless OEM toner is installed.<ref name=":0" />
*'''Anti-consumer software practices''' – Firmware updates cannot be easily rolled back, preventing consumers from restoring lost functionality.<ref name="github-fwupd">[https://github.com/sedrubal/brother_printer_fwupd/issues/9 Brother printer firmware downgrade discussion.]</ref>
*'''Anti-consumer software practices''' – Firmware updates cannot be easily rolled back, preventing consumers from restoring lost functionality.<ref name="github-fwupd">[https://github.com/sedrubal/brother_printer_fwupd/issues/9 Brother printer firmware downgrade discussion.]</ref>
*'''Deceptive practices''' – Printers do not reject third-party toner but intentionally cause a toner failure, which discourages use of third party toners.<ref name="hackernews">[https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31860131 Tell HN: Brother printers now locking out non-OEM paraphernalia.]</ref><ref name="reddit-2" />
*'''Deceptive practices''' – Printers do not reject third-party toner but intentionally cause a toner failure, which discourages use of third party toners.<ref name="hackernews">[https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31860131 Tell HN: Brother printers now locking out non-OEM paraphernalia.]</ref><ref name="reddit-2" />


==How it works==
==How it works==
1. Consumers purchase a '''Brother laser printer''' that previously accepted third-party toner.
1. Consumers purchase a Brother laser printer that previously accepted third-party toner.


2. A '''firmware update (e.g., W1.56)''' is pushed, which does not notify users of any major functional changes.
2. A firmware update (e.g., W1.56) is pushed, which does not notify users of any major functional changes.


3. After updating, users notice that:
3. After updating, users notice that:


*Color registration '''fails automatically''', misaligning prints.<ref name="cups">[https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/CUPS/Printer-specific_problems#Updating_the_firmware ArchWiki - Printer-specific problems with Brother.]</ref>
*Color registration fails automatically, misaligning prints.<ref name="cups">[https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/CUPS/Printer-specific_problems#Updating_the_firmware ArchWiki - Printer-specific problems with Brother.]</ref>
*Brother support acknowledges that installing OEM toner will resolve the issue instantly.<ref name="hackernews" />
*Brother support acknowledges that installing OEM toner will resolve the issue instantly.<ref name="hackernews" />
*'''Older firmware versions are removed from Brother’s servers''', preventing downgrades.<ref name="github-ohbrother">[https://github.com/CauldronDevelopmentLLC/oh-brother/issues/30 Discussion on firmware rollback for Brother printers.]</ref>
*Older firmware versions are removed from Brother’s servers, preventing downgrades.<ref name="github-ohbrother">[https://github.com/CauldronDevelopmentLLC/oh-brother/issues/30 Discussion on firmware rollback for Brother printers.]</ref>


==Impact on Consumer Protection==
==Impact on Consumer Protection==
*Customers who were able to save money buying third-party toner are now '''coerced into expensive OEM toner purchases'''.
*Customers who were able to save money buying third-party toner are now coerced into expensive OEM toner purchases.
*Brother’s '''positive reputation''' for allowing third-party toner is tarnished.
*Brother’s positive reputation for allowing third-party toner is tarnished.
*'''No prior warning''' was given to consumers before these updates were installed.
*No prior warning was given to consumers before these updates were installed.
*Workarounds involve '''blocking firmware updates''' or attempting '''risky firmware downgrades''', both of which Brother actively discourages.
*Workarounds involve blocking firmware updates or attempting firmware downgrades, both of which Brother actively discourages.


==Brother's response==
==Brother's response==
On March 5th 2025, following the publication of a video on the Louis Rossmann YouTube channel, Brother addressed the issue, in a response given to ArsTechnica, stating the following <ref name="ars-response">[https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2025/03/brother-denies-using-firmware-updates-to-brick-printers-with-third-party-ink/ Brother denies using firmware updates to brick printers with third-party ink]</ref>
On March 5th 2025, following the publication of a video on the Louis Rossmann YouTube channel, Brother addressed the issue, in a response given to Ars Technica, stating the following: <ref name="ars-response">[https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2025/03/brother-denies-using-firmware-updates-to-brick-printers-with-third-party-ink/ Brother denies using firmware updates to brick printers with third-party ink]</ref>
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
"We are aware of the recent false claims suggesting that a Brother firmware update may have restricted the use of third-party ink cartridges. Please be assured that Brother firmware updates do not block the use of third-party ink in our machines."
"We are aware of the recent false claims suggesting that a Brother firmware update may have restricted the use of third-party ink cartridges. Please be assured that Brother firmware updates do not block the use of third-party ink in our machines."
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
They also detailed that
They also detailed that:
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
"Brother printers do not intentionally degrade print quality based on whether a Brother Genuine or non-genuine ink/ toner cartridge is used. Brother cannot verify the quality of printing that will result when using a third-party compatible with a Brother printer."
"Brother printers do not intentionally degrade print quality based on whether a Brother Genuine or non-genuine ink/ toner cartridge is used. Brother cannot verify the quality of printing that will result when using a third-party compatible with a Brother printer."
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
Finally they attributed the confusion from consumers to
Finally they attributed the confusion from consumers to:
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
"Brother encourages the use of Brother Genuine ink and toner for optimal performance and reliability, and it is standard practice that we perform a Brother [G]enuine check when troubleshooting a Brother printer. Compatible supplies may range in quality, and in order to verify that a printer is working properly, we like to troubleshoot with Brother Genuine supplies. We believe this check in the process may have led to a misunderstanding[,] but as we confirmed, the firmware update would not be responsible for the degradation of quality or removal of printer features."
"Brother encourages the use of Brother Genuine ink and toner for optimal performance and reliability, and it is standard practice that we perform a Brother Genuine check when troubleshooting a Brother printer. Compatible supplies may range in quality, and in order to verify that a printer is working properly, we like to troubleshoot with Brother Genuine supplies. We believe this check in the process may have led to a misunderstanding[,] but as we confirmed, the firmware update would not be responsible for the degradation of quality or removal of printer features."
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
==User evidence & reports==
==User evidence & reports==
===Hacker News Discussion (2022)===
===Hacker News Discussion (2022)===
*Users noticed that '''Brother printers accepted third-party toner but deliberately degraded print quality'''.
*Users noticed that Brother printers accepted third-party toner but deliberately degraded print quality.
*One user stated:
*One user stated:
<blockquote>''Brother seems to be apparently accepting the ink, but then purposefully making the print quality poorer.''<ref name="hackernews" /></blockquote>
<blockquote>''Brother seems to be apparently accepting the ink, but then purposefully making the print quality poorer.''<ref name="hackernews" /></blockquote>


===Reddit reports (r/printers)===
===Reddit reports (r/printers)===
*A '''firmware update on the Brother MFC-3750''' '''disabled automatic color registration''' when third-party toner was detected.<ref name="reddit" />
*A firmware update on the Brother MFC-3750 disabled automatic color registration when third-party toner was detected.<ref name="reddit" />
*A Brother support agent confirmed that installing OEM toner would "fix" the issue instantly, proving that the printer was being artificially restricted.
*A Brother support agent confirmed that installing OEM toner would "fix" the issue instantly, proving that the printer was being artificially restricted.


===GitHub developer investigation===
===GitHub developer investigation===
*A project analyzing '''Brother firmware updates''' discovered that '''older firmware versions were removed from Brother’s servers''', making it impossible for users to roll back to a working version.<ref name="github-fwupd" />
*A project analyzing Brother firmware updates discovered that older firmware versions were removed from Brother’s servers, making it impossible for users to roll back to a working version.<ref name="github-fwupd" />
*Another GitHub discussion showed that '''Brother firmware updates increasingly lock out more non-Brother toner cartridges with each new update'''<ref name="github-ohbrother" />.
*Another GitHub discussion showed that Brother firmware updates lock out more non-Brother toner cartridges with each update.<ref name="github-ohbrother" />
*This is similar to [[HP Dynamic Security]] which block non-OEM cartridges.
*This is similar to [[HP Dynamic Security]], which blocks non-OEM cartridges.


===Quality Example===
===Quality Example===
[[File:Brother HL-L9310CDW 1.69 1.32 before registration deleted.png|alt=Brother HL-L9310CDW 1.69 1.32, before deletion of colour registration.|none|thumb|800x800px|'''Brother HL-L9310CDW 1.69 1.32, before deletion of colour registration.''']]
[[File:Brother HL-L9310CDW 1.69 1.32 before registration deleted.png|alt=Brother HL-L9310CDW 1.69 1.32, before deletion of colour registration.|none|thumb|800x800px|Brother HL-L9310CDW 1.69 1.32, before deletion of color registration.]]


==Comparison to other industry decisions==
==Comparison to other industry decisions==
Line 81: Line 70:


==Potential legal implications==
==Potential legal implications==
Deliberate function removal '''after purchase''' may qualify as '''deceptive trade practices''' in multiple jurisdictions.
Deliberate function removal after purchase may qualify as deceptive trade practices in multiple jurisdictions.


==Mitigations available to users==
==Mitigations available to users==
#'''Avoid Firmware Updates''' – Disable auto-updates to prevent forced function removal. This may, however, lead to security risks.
#'''Avoid Firmware Updates''' – Disable auto-updates to prevent forced function removal. This may, however, lead to security risks.
#'''Try to downgrade''' – Some users have managed to roll back firmware, though this is increasingly difficult.<ref name="github-ohbrother" />
#'''Try to downgrade''' – Some users have managed to roll back firmware, though this is increasingly difficult.<ref name="github-ohbrother" />
#'''HL-L9310CDW (with firmware main 1.69, sub 1.31):''' On the menu of the printer, delete the colour registration to improve quality by reducing the misalignment of the individual colours. However, the best solution is to have a configuration option to set the offset individual (X, Y) for each colour with the smallest possible increment, perhaps through an external (CUPS) printer driver.
#'''HL-L9310CDW (with firmware main 1.69, sub 1.31):''' On the menu of the printer, delete the color registration to improve quality by reducing the misalignment of the individual colors. However, the best solution is to have a configuration option to set the offset individual (X, Y) for each color with the smallest possible increment, perhaps through an external (CUPS) printer driver.


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 11:13, 13 August 2025

Article Status Notice: Unacceptable Tone/Word Usage

This article needs additional work to meet the wiki's Content Guidelines and be in line with our Mission Statement for comprehensive coverage of consumer protection issues. Specifically it uses wording throughout that is non-compliant with the Editorial guidelines of this wiki.

Learn more ▼

Brother has a reputation for allowing the use of third-party toner and being more consumer friendly than competing printer companies, such as HP. In recent years, they've implemented firmware updates that deliberately lower print quality when using toner that is not from the original equipment manufacturer (OEM). These updates disable color registration & other features, encouraging the use of toner manufactured by Brother over other toner options[1].

Exploitative practices

  • Post-Sale Function Removal – Firmware updates retroactively remove previously available features, such as automatic color registration, for users using non-OEM toner.[2][3]
  • Vendor lock-in via DRM – Printers continue to function with third-party toner but print at lower quality unless OEM toner is installed.[1]
  • Anti-consumer software practices – Firmware updates cannot be easily rolled back, preventing consumers from restoring lost functionality.[4]
  • Deceptive practices – Printers do not reject third-party toner but intentionally cause a toner failure, which discourages use of third party toners.[5][3]

How it works

1. Consumers purchase a Brother laser printer that previously accepted third-party toner.

2. A firmware update (e.g., W1.56) is pushed, which does not notify users of any major functional changes.

3. After updating, users notice that:

  • Color registration fails automatically, misaligning prints.[6]
  • Brother support acknowledges that installing OEM toner will resolve the issue instantly.[5]
  • Older firmware versions are removed from Brother’s servers, preventing downgrades.[7]

Impact on Consumer Protection

  • Customers who were able to save money buying third-party toner are now coerced into expensive OEM toner purchases.
  • Brother’s positive reputation for allowing third-party toner is tarnished.
  • No prior warning was given to consumers before these updates were installed.
  • Workarounds involve blocking firmware updates or attempting firmware downgrades, both of which Brother actively discourages.

Brother's response

On March 5th 2025, following the publication of a video on the Louis Rossmann YouTube channel, Brother addressed the issue, in a response given to Ars Technica, stating the following: [8]

"We are aware of the recent false claims suggesting that a Brother firmware update may have restricted the use of third-party ink cartridges. Please be assured that Brother firmware updates do not block the use of third-party ink in our machines."

They also detailed that:

"Brother printers do not intentionally degrade print quality based on whether a Brother Genuine or non-genuine ink/ toner cartridge is used. Brother cannot verify the quality of printing that will result when using a third-party compatible with a Brother printer."

Finally they attributed the confusion from consumers to:

"Brother encourages the use of Brother Genuine ink and toner for optimal performance and reliability, and it is standard practice that we perform a Brother Genuine check when troubleshooting a Brother printer. Compatible supplies may range in quality, and in order to verify that a printer is working properly, we like to troubleshoot with Brother Genuine supplies. We believe this check in the process may have led to a misunderstanding[,] but as we confirmed, the firmware update would not be responsible for the degradation of quality or removal of printer features."

User evidence & reports

Hacker News Discussion (2022)

  • Users noticed that Brother printers accepted third-party toner but deliberately degraded print quality.
  • One user stated:

Brother seems to be apparently accepting the ink, but then purposefully making the print quality poorer.[5]

Reddit reports (r/printers)

  • A firmware update on the Brother MFC-3750 disabled automatic color registration when third-party toner was detected.[2]
  • A Brother support agent confirmed that installing OEM toner would "fix" the issue instantly, proving that the printer was being artificially restricted.

GitHub developer investigation

  • A project analyzing Brother firmware updates discovered that older firmware versions were removed from Brother’s servers, making it impossible for users to roll back to a working version.[4]
  • Another GitHub discussion showed that Brother firmware updates lock out more non-Brother toner cartridges with each update.[7]
  • This is similar to HP Dynamic Security, which blocks non-OEM cartridges.

Quality Example

Brother HL-L9310CDW 1.69 1.32, before deletion of colour registration.
Brother HL-L9310CDW 1.69 1.32, before deletion of color registration.

Comparison to other industry decisions

Company Tactic Used
HP "Dynamic Security" firmware updates blocking non-OEM ink
Epson Ink expiration DRM, even when cartridges are full
Canon Firmware updates that disable scanning when ink is low
Brother Print degradation for non-OEM toner users

Potential legal implications

Deliberate function removal after purchase may qualify as deceptive trade practices in multiple jurisdictions.

Mitigations available to users

  1. Avoid Firmware Updates – Disable auto-updates to prevent forced function removal. This may, however, lead to security risks.
  2. Try to downgrade – Some users have managed to roll back firmware, though this is increasingly difficult.[7]
  3. HL-L9310CDW (with firmware main 1.69, sub 1.31): On the menu of the printer, delete the color registration to improve quality by reducing the misalignment of the individual colors. However, the best solution is to have a configuration option to set the offset individual (X, Y) for each color with the smallest possible increment, perhaps through an external (CUPS) printer driver.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Jacobs, Skye (2025-03-05). "Brother printers are quietly sabotaging third-party toner with firmware updates".
  2. 2.0 2.1 Brother MFC firmware update - non-genuine toner now disables critical features.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Brother MFC-L3370CDW Firmware Downgrade needed
  4. 4.0 4.1 Brother printer firmware downgrade discussion.
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 Tell HN: Brother printers now locking out non-OEM paraphernalia.
  6. ArchWiki - Printer-specific problems with Brother.
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 Discussion on firmware rollback for Brother printers.
  8. Brother denies using firmware updates to brick printers with third-party ink