Talk:South Eastern (train operating company): Difference between revisions
Latest comment: Yesterday at 10:52 by AnotherConsumerRightsPerson in topic Relevancy discussion
No edit summary |
→Relevancy discussion: Reply |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Relevancy discussion == | ==Relevancy discussion== | ||
Hi, Just opening a discussion as to how well this article, and the incidents related to South Eastern, fit with the wiki's [[Mission statement|mission]] and [[Consumer Rights Wiki:Inclusion guidelines|inclusion criteria]] | Hi, Just opening a discussion as to how well this article, and the incidents related to South Eastern, fit with the wiki's [[Mission statement|mission]] and [[Consumer Rights Wiki:Inclusion guidelines|inclusion criteria]] | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Have added a relevancy notice, as the incidents listed appear to be as a result of incompetency or mismanagement, rather than malicious or large-scale anti-consumer behaviour. Assuming that refunds etc. were provided after these events, I'm not sure how they relate to the wiki? [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 10:36, 14 August 2025 (UTC) (Edited: unfucked the formatting) | Have added a relevancy notice, as the incidents listed appear to be as a result of incompetency or mismanagement, rather than malicious or large-scale anti-consumer behaviour. Assuming that refunds etc. were provided after these events, I'm not sure how they relate to the wiki? [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 10:36, 14 August 2025 (UTC) (Edited: unfucked the formatting) | ||
:Hello, honestly i totally agree with you on this now hearing your point of view. I wanted to experiment with making a page for a UK train company but to be honest i'm not really sure how well this fits either. We could just delete this from the wiki at this point. I could not find anything else to talk about beside the issues listed that were notable enough, so this might just be a useless article altogether. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|AnotherConsumerRightsPerson]] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|talk]]) 10:52, 14 August 2025 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:52, 14 August 2025
Relevancy discussion
Hi, Just opening a discussion as to how well this article, and the incidents related to South Eastern, fit with the wiki's mission and inclusion criteria
I've added my comment from my edit notice below, to start the discussion off:
Have added a relevancy notice, as the incidents listed appear to be as a result of incompetency or mismanagement, rather than malicious or large-scale anti-consumer behaviour. Assuming that refunds etc. were provided after these events, I'm not sure how they relate to the wiki? Keith (talk) 10:36, 14 August 2025 (UTC) (Edited: unfucked the formatting)
- Hello, honestly i totally agree with you on this now hearing your point of view. I wanted to experiment with making a page for a UK train company but to be honest i'm not really sure how well this fits either. We could just delete this from the wiki at this point. I could not find anything else to talk about beside the issues listed that were notable enough, so this might just be a useless article altogether. AnotherConsumerRightsPerson (talk) 10:52, 14 August 2025 (UTC)