Talk:GrapheneOS: Difference between revisions

Line 14:

::I agree! It is imperative that we maintain the integrity of the contribution guidelines regardless if the company is "good" or "bad."

::I think secondary sources are valuable for reception and verification, but primary sources would be best when talking about their "Privacy Policy," "Terms of Service," and license. [[User:Pancho|Pancho]] ([[User talk:Pancho|talk]]) 17:06, 16 August 2025 (UTC)

::Yes - having a strict

::Yes - having a strict approach to sourcing will probably be neccesary to prevent the wiki from being flooded in this way.

::We should also consider what kinds of 'good' attributes are relevant to the wiki, as our relevancy criteria, at the moment, only really examine what kinds of negative attributes are relevant. Obviously it is beneficial for the consumer if a high-quality product is offered at a low price, but that shouldn't be sufficient for an article to appear on the wiki. Maybe we need to draw something up around the definition of 'new' consumer protection as defined in the [[Mission statement]]? [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 20:04, 16 August 2025 (UTC)

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 ::I agree! It is imperative that we maintain the integrity of the contribution guidelines regardless if the company is "good" or "bad."
 ::I think secondary sources are valuable for reception and verification, but primary sources would be best when talking about their "Privacy Policy," "Terms of Service," and license.  [[User:Pancho|Pancho]] ([[User talk:Pancho|talk]]) 17:06, 16 August 2025 (UTC)
-::Yes - having a strict
+::Yes - having a strict approach to sourcing will probably be neccesary to prevent the wiki from being flooded in this way.
 ::We should also consider what kinds of 'good' attributes are relevant to the wiki, as our relevancy criteria, at the moment, only really examine what kinds of negative attributes are relevant. Obviously it is beneficial for the consumer if a high-quality product is offered at a low price, but that shouldn't be sufficient for an article to appear on the wiki. Maybe we need to draw something up around the definition of 'new' consumer protection as defined in the [[Mission statement]]? [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 20:04, 16 August 2025 (UTC)