Consumer Rights Wiki talk:Moderators' noticeboard: Difference between revisions

← Older edit Newer edit →

VisualWikitext

Add topic

Revision as of 02:12, 21 August 2025 edit JackFromWisconsin (talk \| contribs) confirmed, Administrators 163 edits clarify ← Older edit		Revision as of 10:44, 21 August 2025 edit undo Keith (talk \| contribs) Autoconfirmed users, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Push subscription managers, superadmin, Suppressors, Administrators 1,021 edits →Request for comment: Transcript articles: Reply Tag: Reply Newer edit →
Line 39:		Line 39:

	:yeah thats me. i apologize for the strong language in my original post on the talk page of the [[Insta360 camera locks you out "to protect your consumer rights" - corporate gaslighting\|article]]. I just dont feel these articles are worth anything at all. I doubt anyone would ever read them. And their existance may even turn people down from writing their own article on the subject since one (though of poor quality) already exists. I dont know why they were allowed in the first place, but i feel like they should be removed. In my opinion, they bring down the quality of the wiki. If a gouvernment representative ever looks at the wiki for info and falls onto AI bs, they might not see the wiki as a quality documentation. [[User:Plankton\|Plankton]] ([[User talk:Plankton\|talk]]) 01:24, 21 August 2025 (UTC)		:yeah thats me. i apologize for the strong language in my original post on the talk page of the [[Insta360 camera locks you out "to protect your consumer rights" - corporate gaslighting\|article]]. I just dont feel these articles are worth anything at all. I doubt anyone would ever read them. And their existance may even turn people down from writing their own article on the subject since one (though of poor quality) already exists. I dont know why they were allowed in the first place, but i feel like they should be removed. In my opinion, they bring down the quality of the wiki. If a gouvernment representative ever looks at the wiki for info and falls onto AI bs, they might not see the wiki as a quality documentation. [[User:Plankton\|Plankton]] ([[User talk:Plankton\|talk]]) 01:24, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
			::I think you're right. They served a purpose to start with, but have outlived it. I'll do a proper purge of them and anything related to them shortly, starting with deleting those ones you linked just now [[User:Keith\|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith\|talk]]) 10:44, 21 August 2025 (UTC)