Reply to Kostas
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:


: There's also the topic of capitalization. Again, sentence case ([[:Category:Right to repair|Right to repair]]) was more popular than title case ([[:Category:Right to Repair|Right to Repair]]), so that's where I put things. Case is also a consideration in the case of [[:Category:Product Line|Product Line]]. [[User:Waldo|Waldo]] ([[User talk:Waldo|talk]]) 13:17, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
: There's also the topic of capitalization. Again, sentence case ([[:Category:Right to repair|Right to repair]]) was more popular than title case ([[:Category:Right to Repair|Right to Repair]]), so that's where I put things. Case is also a consideration in the case of [[:Category:Product Line|Product Line]]. [[User:Waldo|Waldo]] ([[User talk:Waldo|talk]]) 13:17, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
:: I haven't been able to discuss anything on the discord today, and won't be able to until this evening, but I think that sentence case is probably the way to go, and would at this stage support a sitewise sentence case policy. I've added you as a bot, so no more captchas! you've filled in plenty already lol. I have no strong opinion on pluralisation of category names. I think that products and product lines might both end up being article types, because for certain products it will just make sense to have their own page, and I don't want to be too dogmatic about it especially with how young the wiki is. [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 13:24, 18 January 2025 (UTC)