Talk:Futurehome Smarthub mandatory subscription fee: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 14:23, 1 September 2025 edit 78.2.217.229 (talk) →Re: how lying companies damage the Rossmann brand: Typo ← Older edit		Revision as of 16:13, 1 September 2025 edit undo HumanShyGuy (talk \| contribs) confirmed 1 edit No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 12:		Line 12:

	Unless the host cryptographically signs their pages (which would, of course, not be desirable for hiding the past), I don't think there's another way.		Unless the host cryptographically signs their pages (which would, of course, not be desirable for hiding the past), I don't think there's another way.

			Maybe another idea would be to push for a law that force the website to archive any change that they made to ensure no fraud is made, or to push a law or exception to allow archiving website to keep the archive of the website for potentiel proof that a company did commits a crime and would try to hide any evidence of said crime those giving us the consumer probably the only way to get evidence and proove them of there wrong.