Honey browser plugin controversy: Difference between revisions

Line 31:

Honey will sometimes disrupt this practice by replacing existing affiliate links with their own at the checkout page whenever a customer interacts with the extension in search of coupons. Even when Honey is unable to find a coupon for the customer, it will still frequently replace the affiliate link. When the customer makes their purchase, Honey takes credit for the sale and gets the commission.

The Honey extension was largely advertised via Content Creators on YouTube as well as other social media platforms. Affiliate marketing makes up a significant portion of a Content Creator's revenue. Most of the influencers who promoted Honey were unaware of its practices and thus unknowingly promoted a browser extension that poaches their affiliate revenue. Estimates of "stolen" revenue are upwards of 5 million USD. The discovery of Honey's practices has led to a class action lawsuit launched by Wendover Productions.

The Honey extension was largely advertised via Content Creators on YouTube as well as other social media platforms. Affiliate marketing makes up a significant portion of a Content Creator's revenue. Most of the influencers who promoted Honey were unaware of its practices and thus unknowingly promoted a browser extension that poaches their affiliate revenue. Estimates of "stolen" revenue are upwards of 5 million USD. The discovery of Honey's practices has led to a [[class action lawsuit]] launched by Wendover Productions.

* ''It is this practice in particular that has attracted legal attention, as several of Honey’s victims in this instance are/were attorneys who create content about legal controversies (such as LegalEagle and America’s Attorney). They have documented their view on the lawsuit here: https://honeylawsuit.com/''<!-- this is a very partisan source - we shouldn't be saying 'find out more' and then linking to one half of a lawsuit. Instead, try and find some media source which has a reasonable detail of reporting on the lawsuit.

@@ Line 31: / Line 31: @@
 Honey will sometimes disrupt this practice by replacing existing affiliate links with their own at the checkout page whenever a customer interacts with the extension in search of coupons. Even when Honey is unable to find a coupon for the customer, it will still frequently replace the affiliate link. When the customer makes their purchase, Honey takes credit for the sale and gets the commission.
-The Honey extension was largely advertised via Content Creators on YouTube as well as other social media platforms. Affiliate marketing makes up a significant portion of a Content Creator's revenue. Most of the influencers who promoted Honey were unaware of its practices and thus unknowingly promoted a browser extension that poaches their affiliate revenue. Estimates of "stolen" revenue are upwards of 5 million USD. The discovery of Honey's practices has led to a class action lawsuit launched by Wendover Productions.
+The Honey extension was largely advertised via Content Creators on YouTube as well as other social media platforms. Affiliate marketing makes up a significant portion of a Content Creator's revenue. Most of the influencers who promoted Honey were unaware of its practices and thus unknowingly promoted a browser extension that poaches their affiliate revenue. Estimates of "stolen" revenue are upwards of 5 million USD. The discovery of Honey's practices has led to a [[class action lawsuit]] launched by Wendover Productions.
 * ''It is this practice in particular that has attracted legal attention, as several of Honey’s victims in this instance are/were attorneys who create content about legal controversies (such as LegalEagle and America’s Attorney). They have documented their view on the lawsuit here: https://honeylawsuit.com/''<!-- this is a very partisan source - we shouldn't be saying 'find out more' and then linking to one half of a lawsuit. Instead, try and find some media source which has a reasonable detail of reporting on the lawsuit.