Talk:Apple's anti-repair and anti-refurbishment practices: Difference between revisions
→Question: new section |
→Question: Reply |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
::Its focus from the start has been from a consumer perspective, but it was just difficult coming up with a good name for the article lol [[User:JamesTDG|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG|talk]]) 08:32, 12 September 2025 (UTC) | ::Its focus from the start has been from a consumer perspective, but it was just difficult coming up with a good name for the article lol [[User:JamesTDG|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG|talk]]) 08:32, 12 September 2025 (UTC) | ||
== Question == | ==Question== | ||
I am unable to see how "Blocking 3rd-party apps" falls under anti-repair and anti-refurbishment (if we are talking about general Jailbreaking/Cydia or alternative app stores). I feel like it should stay on the main Apple article. [[User:Mr Pollo|Mr Pollo]] ([[User talk:Mr Pollo|talk]]) 16:25, 12 September 2025 (UTC) | I am unable to see how "Blocking 3rd-party apps" falls under anti-repair and anti-refurbishment (if we are talking about general Jailbreaking/Cydia or alternative app stores). I feel like it should stay on the main Apple article. [[User:Mr Pollo|Mr Pollo]] ([[User talk:Mr Pollo|talk]]) 16:25, 12 September 2025 (UTC) | ||
:Agree. The original title of this page was 'apple's e-waste [something]', but I don't think it would have fit there either. [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 16:27, 12 September 2025 (UTC) | |||