Talk:Artificial intelligence: Difference between revisions
→Scope?: Reply |
→Scope?: Reply |
||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
:::'''Intellectual property''' Perhaps I could have picked a more evocative title? For the purposes of AI, every person is a "creative." This concerns use of your e-mails/facebook posts/tweets/photographs/security camera footage/footage from your roomba/footage from your cars cameras/etc. for training AI. Ownerships of the logs of where you go, what you buy (and where and when). Who you communicate with. Ownership of your medical scans. The output of your medical monitors (CGM, CPAP, pacemaker, smart watch, etc.), and their use in training/advertising/whatever. Publication of your AI queries, your chat logs. Use of AI responses. [[User:Drakeula|Drakeula]] ([[User talk:Drakeula|talk]]) 09:58, 13 September 2025 (UTC) | :::'''Intellectual property''' Perhaps I could have picked a more evocative title? For the purposes of AI, every person is a "creative." This concerns use of your e-mails/facebook posts/tweets/photographs/security camera footage/footage from your roomba/footage from your cars cameras/etc. for training AI. Ownerships of the logs of where you go, what you buy (and where and when). Who you communicate with. Ownership of your medical scans. The output of your medical monitors (CGM, CPAP, pacemaker, smart watch, etc.), and their use in training/advertising/whatever. Publication of your AI queries, your chat logs. Use of AI responses. [[User:Drakeula|Drakeula]] ([[User talk:Drakeula|talk]]) 09:58, 13 September 2025 (UTC) | ||
::::I suppose "big data" might be a useful adjunct term to use here. [[User:Drakeula|Drakeula]] ([[User talk:Drakeula|talk]]) 10:03, 13 September 2025 (UTC) | ::::I suppose "big data" might be a useful adjunct term to use here. [[User:Drakeula|Drakeula]] ([[User talk:Drakeula|talk]]) 10:03, 13 September 2025 (UTC) | ||
::::I think the way in which the terms of many services unreasonably opt you into AI training off your private data without properly, where it is framed as an anti-consumer contract term, is reasonable for inclusion. I'm less sure about the blatant grabbing of works visible in the public space, as this doesn't feel like as much of a consumer issue. | |||
::::In a similar way, if there was a spate of phone repair companies using bullshit terms to refuse to return phones sent in for repair, that would fit the wiki, but if an organized crime gang was running a phone theft ring across a country, that would not fit the wiki. Both are stealing your phone, but the way in which it is being done is relevant as to whether it should be included in the Wiki. [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 13:31, 16 September 2025 (UTC) | |||
==Appeal posted re proposed deletion== | ==Appeal posted re proposed deletion== | ||