Interchangeable parts: Difference between revisions
reduce inventory. Headlight example |
→Why it matters: light bulb |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
==Examples== | ==Examples== | ||
* Replacement ink/toner cartridges for printers and copiers. | *Replacement ink/toner cartridges for printers and copiers. | ||
* Automotive | *Automotive headlight enclosures used to be circular and fairly standardized. | ||
*Lightbulbs used to be standard. Now automobiles, appliances often use non-standard lights, so you can't just replace the bulb. You have to get a whole custom module, or replace the appliance, or do specialized electronics repair. | |||
{{Ph-T-E}} | {{Ph-T-E}} | ||
==Why it matters== | ==Why it matters== | ||
Interchangeability was initially devised as a way to reduce cost, simplify the assembly of goods for accessibility and repair, reduce inventory, and scaling. More manufacturers actively reject interchangeable parts as time goes on. Proprietary parts or supplies may mean more profit for the manufacturer if they can charge more for their special part, or keep a customer locked in to their products. Today, as right-to-repair has developed into a reactionary principle for what should be a given, interchangeability becomes a part of the conversation. | Interchangeability was initially devised as a way to reduce cost, simplify the assembly of goods for accessibility and repair, reduce inventory, and scaling. More manufacturers actively reject interchangeable parts as time goes on. Proprietary parts or supplies may mean more profit for the manufacturer if they can charge more for their special part, or keep a customer locked in to their products. Today, as right-to-repair has developed into a reactionary principle for what should be a given, interchangeability becomes a part of the conversation. | ||
Interchangeable parts reduce waste. | |||
For example: | For example: | ||