Talk:GameSpy server shutdown: Difference between revisions
→Relevance: new section |
→Relevance: Reply |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Points of additional research == | ==Points of additional research== | ||
GOG giving free copies of STALKER to people who were affected by GameSpy | GOG giving free copies of STALKER to people who were affected by GameSpy | ||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
https://www.reddit.com/r/Games/comments/22ljrh/after_the_annoucement_of_the_gamespy_shutdown/ [[User:JamesTDG|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG|talk]]) 09:17, 8 July 2025 (UTC) | https://www.reddit.com/r/Games/comments/22ljrh/after_the_annoucement_of_the_gamespy_shutdown/ [[User:JamesTDG|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG|talk]]) 09:17, 8 July 2025 (UTC) | ||
== Relevance == | ==Relevance== | ||
So, we should probably discuss the relevance mark, since the GameSpy shutdown hurt ownership on a massive scale, and it was not because GS was unable to afford it, but rather the company that bought their server infra decided to just shut it all down [[User:JamesTDG|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG|talk]]) 09:38, 1 October 2025 (UTC) | So, we should probably discuss the relevance mark, since the GameSpy shutdown hurt ownership on a massive scale, and it was not because GS was unable to afford it, but rather the company that bought their server infra decided to just shut it all down [[User:JamesTDG|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG|talk]]) 09:38, 1 October 2025 (UTC) | ||
:So why is the relevance questioned? It seems like a classic example of the sort of new consumer issue the wiki is intended for. [[User:Drakeula|Drakeula]] ([[User talk:Drakeula|talk]]) 01:36, 24 October 2025 (UTC) | |||