Consumer Rights Wiki talk:Moderators' noticeboard: Difference between revisions
→Appeal deletion of Medical equipment page: Sorry. More content added. |
|||
| Line 90: | Line 90: | ||
::<nowiki>[[Category:Medical equipment]]</nowiki> | ::<nowiki>[[Category:Medical equipment]]</nowiki> | ||
::Let me know what you both think of this approach! [[User:Mr Pollo|Mr Pollo]] ([[User talk:Mr Pollo|talk]]) 22:42, 3 October 2025 (UTC) | ::Let me know what you both think of this approach! [[User:Mr Pollo|Mr Pollo]] ([[User talk:Mr Pollo|talk]]) 22:42, 3 October 2025 (UTC) | ||
:::Sorry if the term demoted offended. It was not intended to. I was thinking in terms of the tree structure for the articles, not in terms of possible emotional impact. Lots of leaf [incident] articles, smaller number of device articles which aggregate/lead to the incidents, but can cover things more broadly, beyond just an incident. With theme articles (or possibly a missing article type, like a navigation articles) above that. So an incident article is less than a product page in the sense of being less general (more specific), not less important or valuable. I always try to be courteous, but sometimes I don't think of possible interpretations. So, my apologies. | |||
:::I added a bit more meat to the article, hoping it will make it clearer what it could become, or inspire links to other relevant articles that exist, or inspire people to cover more medtech. If this article is to be deleted, what is the plan? Where would content like I added to the article better be placed? Is there a better name this theme article could be placed under? (I started a thread to discuss this on the article's talk page.) | |||
:::For example, if this page goes, and the ventilator page just covers the covid emergency, then where can we put information about ventiators beyond the initial Covid surge? | |||
:::I have more response, but want to sleep on it. [[User:Drakeula|Drakeula]] ([[User talk:Drakeula|talk]]) 18:22, 4 October 2025 (UTC) | |||