Sideloading: Difference between revisions
some restructuring and elaborating |
m more organizing |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''Sideloading''' refers to the act of downloading and installing mobile apps without the restrictions of designated app stores. | '''Sideloading''' refers to the act of downloading and installing mobile apps without the restrictions of designated app stores. | ||
== Background == | ==Background== | ||
[[Android]] is an open-source operating system that allows app downloads irrespective of the source of the app file. When Android was bought by [[Google]] in 2005, Google built a software repository, the [[Google Play Store]], on top of the android framework, leading to most app installations taking place via the Play Store. | [[Android]] is an open-source operating system that allows app downloads irrespective of the source of the app file. When Android was bought by [[Google]] in 2005, Google built a software repository, the [[Google Play Store]], on top of the android framework, leading to most app installations taking place via the Play Store. | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
The term ''sideloading'' denotes the practice of downloading external app files by means other than the official stores, though it assumes that the ecosystem lock-in is the standard protocol while alternative means are "unofficial." | The term ''sideloading'' denotes the practice of downloading external app files by means other than the official stores, though it assumes that the ecosystem lock-in is the standard protocol while alternative means are "unofficial." | ||
== Why it happens == | ==Why it happens== | ||
Without meaningful competition, monopoly providers often become complacent and lack incentive to maintain quality and innovation. A single store means another single point of failure for a platform. When a provider stops support, perfectly serviceable devices may be bricked. Many other platforms, like Windows and Linux have a variety of stores, repositories, and individual sites for getting software. Open platforms and choice allow devices to succeed, even when a particular manufacturer's software store is not well run. | Without meaningful competition, monopoly providers often become complacent and lack incentive to maintain quality and innovation. A single store means another single point of failure for a platform. When a provider stops support, perfectly serviceable devices may be bricked. Many other platforms, like Windows and Linux have a variety of stores, repositories, and individual sites for getting software. Open platforms and choice allow devices to succeed, even when a particular manufacturer's software store is not well run. | ||
Therefore, the openness of Android has made it a good option for many developers and consumers to do with their devices as they see fit. | Therefore, the openness of Android has made it a good option for many developers and consumers to do with their devices as they see fit. | ||
[[Google plans to restrict sideloading of Android apps]]. | == Related incidents == | ||
=== Google announces plan to restrict app downloads === | |||
''Main article:'' [[Google plans to restrict sideloading of Android apps]]. | |||
Google claims that this will increase security, however they have a history of allowing unsafe and low quality content on their platforms.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Abrams |first=Lawrence |date=September 16, 2025 |title=Google nukes 224 Android malware apps behind massive ad fraud campaign |url=https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/google-nukes-224-android-malware-apps-behind-massive-ad-fraud-campaign/}}</ref> It is unclear that moving to a single authority for trust will improve user experience on Android devices. | |||
==References== | ==References== |