Talk:Malicious compliance: Difference between revisions
Add topicLatest comment: 7 November 2025 by Beanie Bo in topic Relevance
m Drakeula moved page Talk:Malicious Compliance to Talk:Malicious compliance: Misspelled title: Not in sentence case |
→Relevance: Reply |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:It’s tiny too, you can go on the [[Consumer Rights Wiki talk:Moderators' noticeboard|Moderators' noticeboard]] about this. Just not much to talk about at all. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|AnotherConsumerRightsPerson]] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|talk]]) 07:38, 29 August 2025 (UTC) | :It’s tiny too, you can go on the [[Consumer Rights Wiki talk:Moderators' noticeboard|Moderators' noticeboard]] about this. Just not much to talk about at all. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|AnotherConsumerRightsPerson]] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|talk]]) 07:38, 29 August 2025 (UTC) | ||
:I removed the deletion request. There is potential for this to be a theme article that notes relevant cases of malicious compliance, particularly related to GDPR and other legislation [[User:Beanie Bo|Beanie Bo]] ([[User talk:Beanie Bo|talk]]) 13:33, 7 November 2025 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 13:33, 7 November 2025
Relevance
[edit source]I get why this concept may be relevant, but I don't believe it's worth a dedicated article. It's vague and isn't fundamentally unethical. Beanie Bo (talk) 02:00, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
- It’s tiny too, you can go on the Moderators' noticeboard about this. Just not much to talk about at all. AnotherConsumerRightsPerson (talk) 07:38, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
- I removed the deletion request. There is potential for this to be a theme article that notes relevant cases of malicious compliance, particularly related to GDPR and other legislation Beanie Bo (talk) 13:33, 7 November 2025 (UTC)