Talk:Financial Censorship: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
First, crowdsource evidence of payment processors’ boilerplate—CSR recordings, policy contradictions, and developer testimonies. Second, weaponize this proof to pressure top shareholders like BlackRock and Vanguard, demanding CEO accountability and transparency. Also, the politically inclined could trigger bipartisan hell by reaching out to lawmakers on both sides—progressives see LGBTQ+ suppression, libertarians see market collusion. This may force Senate subpoenas. | First, crowdsource evidence of payment processors’ boilerplate—CSR recordings, policy contradictions, and developer testimonies. Second, weaponize this proof to pressure top shareholders like BlackRock and Vanguard, demanding CEO accountability and transparency. Also, the politically inclined could trigger bipartisan hell by reaching out to lawmakers on both sides—progressives see LGBTQ+ suppression, libertarians see market collusion. This may force Senate subpoenas. | ||
I've also heard of folks reaching out to the FTC (love it) and there are several change.org petitions. We could list these ideas in more detail as well. If there is any interest, I'll build out my attack via SEC wiki pages. {{Unsigned|IDasaCat}} 07:30, 17 August 2025 | I've also heard of folks reaching out to the FTC (love it) and there are several change.org petitions. We could list these ideas in more detail as well. If there is any interest, I'll build out my attack via SEC wiki pages. {{Unsigned|IDasaCat}} 07:30, 17 August 2025 (UTC) | ||