JS: Reply
Rudxain (talk | contribs)
JS: Reply
Line 71: Line 71:
:Rip my noscript extension, we need to get this on the wiki RIGHT NOW!! :( (joke)
:Rip my noscript extension, we need to get this on the wiki RIGHT NOW!! :( (joke)
:Seriously though, if it is actually necessary and there are reliable sources, then sure! [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|talk]]) 06:07, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
:Seriously though, if it is actually necessary and there are reliable sources, then sure! [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|talk]]) 06:07, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
::lmao. yeah I agree. It's not that big of a deal. But it raises privacy and security concerns, and it's related to [[bloatware]]:
::* https://idlewords.com/talks/website_obesity.htm
::* https://tonsky.me/blog/js-bloat
::[[User:Rudxain|Rudxain]] ([[User talk:Rudxain|talk]]) 06:28, 14 November 2025 (UTC)


==G forces screen-saver to have privacy-policy; they get roasted instead==
==G forces screen-saver to have privacy-policy; they get roasted instead==