Talk:Apple: Difference between revisions
questioning airpower |
questioning if a5 activation issues should be of the included. |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
I don't understand this line under Recent Attempts to do Better, is there a grammatical error here, or do I just not know the correct terminology (if this is a terminology issue, does the Senator rule apply?)? "A battery removable with just a 9V battery in the 2024 [https://support.apple.com/en-us/120671 iPhone 16] and [https://support.apple.com/en-us/120671 iPhone 16 Plus]." [[User:Icandostuff|Icandostuff]] ([[User talk:Icandostuff|talk]]) 14:29, 16 August 2025 (UTC) | I don't understand this line under Recent Attempts to do Better, is there a grammatical error here, or do I just not know the correct terminology (if this is a terminology issue, does the Senator rule apply?)? "A battery removable with just a 9V battery in the 2024 [https://support.apple.com/en-us/120671 iPhone 16] and [https://support.apple.com/en-us/120671 iPhone 16 Plus]." [[User:Icandostuff|Icandostuff]] ([[User talk:Icandostuff|talk]]) 14:29, 16 August 2025 (UTC) | ||
Would Apple breaking the activation of A5 devices with IMEIs starting with 9900, preventing these from being used at all without purchasing hardware to circumvent the activation? I don't think there are great sources for these, as most are on [https://www.reddit.com/r/LegacyJailbreak/comments/1qswbhi/9900%20imei%20a5a6%20a9%20ios%209%20and%20future%202027/ reddit] and discord kinda (sadge). I think it's a somewhat important issue, considering this can happen to other devices, like what's happening to [https://fixvx.com/%20orangera1n/status/2034015387520586229 A8 (literally as of writing)]. thanks! -pre (im too lazy to make an account right now) [[Special:Contributions/50.65.201.220|50.65.201.220]] 04:45, 18 March 2026 (UTC) | |||
== Some problems with the article == | == Some problems with the article == | ||