Anti-privacy legislation: Difference between revisions
m changed "elements of privacy taken away" to "Method of Eroding Privacy" |
added 3 summaries |
||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
|[[UK Online Safety Act]] | |[[UK Online Safety Act]] | ||
|United Kingdom | |United Kingdom | ||
| | |The UK Online Safety Act is a set of law's that pushes for [[Age verification]] in order to protect quote; "children and adults online". Said enforcement includes disapproving "Illegal Content", & forcing website and domain owners to utilize "highly effective age assurance" to prevent children from accessing potentially harmful content. This law also requires such platforms to " provide parents and children with clear and accessible ways to report problems online when they do arise." | ||
|Age Verification | |Age Verification | ||
|Approved | |Approved (Signed on Oct 26, 2023, Active since Jul 25 2025) | ||
|- | |||
|[https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2025/253 Florida HB 253] | |||
|Florida, U.S | |||
|Florida's 253 House Bill disallows ones ability to, in their own words, utilize "license plate obscuring devices" to avoid detection by alpr cameras("escaping from or avoiding detection or arrest in connection with such crime"). | |||
|[[Flock license plate readers|ALPR]] Jamming Circumvention | |||
|Approved (Signed on May 19th 2025, Active since Oct 1 2025) | |||
|- | |- | ||
|[[Texas Senate Bill 2420 (2025)]] | |[[Texas Senate Bill 2420 (2025)]] | ||
| Line 52: | Line 58: | ||
|Age Verification | |Age Verification | ||
|Rejected | |Rejected | ||
|- | |||
|[https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1043 California Assembly Bill No. 1043] | |||
|California, U.S | |||
|The California Assembly Bill No. "1043" requires operating system owners, publishers/providers, & developers & maintainers to implement system level age verification via an "accessible interface at account setup", which then is used as an "age signal" for "applications available in a covered application store". Any person that violates this proposed bill (perhaps soon to be law) will face a fine of 2,500$ per unintentional violation or 7,500$ per intentional violation. | |||
|Age Indication | |||
|Approved (Active Jan 1, 2027) | |||
|- | |- | ||
|[https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/SB26-051 Colorado Senate Bill SB26-051] | |[https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/SB26-051 Colorado Senate Bill SB26-051] | ||
|Colorado, U.S | |Colorado, U.S | ||
|The Colorado Senate Bill "SB26-051" requires operating | |The Colorado Senate Bill "SB26-051" is a "copycat bill" of California's own "Assembly Bill No. 1043" which requires operating systems of any kind(open source or not), to utilize an interface on account setup to gain an age signal for developers to use in the main app store. Overview of said bill says as follows; "The bill requires application developers to receive user age information and use it to comply with any applicable law." | ||
|Device-Based Age Indication | |Device-Based Age Indication | ||
|Under Consideration | |Under Consideration | ||
|- | |- | ||
|[https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-bill/737/text S.737 - Screen Act] | |[https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-bill/737/text S.737 - Screen Act] | ||