Consumer Rights Wiki talk:Moderators' noticeboard: Difference between revisions

← Older edit Newer edit →

VisualWikitext

Add topic

Revision as of 07:33, 2 March 2026 edit AnotherConsumerRightsPerson (talk \| contribs) confirmed, Administrators 2,883 edits →Some Thoughts???: Reply Tag: Reply ← Older edit		Revision as of 11:02, 2 March 2026 edit undo Keith (talk \| contribs) Autoconfirmed users, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Push subscription managers, superadmin, Suppressors, Administrators 1,899 edits →Some Thoughts???: Reply Tag: Reply Newer edit →
Line 267:		Line 267:

	:I'm not entirely sure if human rights issues are even allowed in the first place. Sure, it's absolutely horrible, but I'm not sure if it's in scope. We'll see what Keith says anyway. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 07:33, 2 March 2026 (UTC)		:I'm not entirely sure if human rights issues are even allowed in the first place. Sure, it's absolutely horrible, but I'm not sure if it's in scope. We'll see what Keith says anyway. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 07:33, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
			::torn on this one. it's done in service of market control etc., but it certainly seems like a issue more adjacent to worker abuses or environmental damage which are out-of-scope (and also it's being done in service of securing supply rather than securing demand). maybe could be mentioned off-hand as context for something else (e.g. demonstrating that they have capability/track record of working in that way), with a link to the relevant wikipedia page, but I don't think it makes sense to have a full page for it on the wiki. I assume Wikipedia has it pretty well documented? [[User:Keith\|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith\|talk]]) 11:02, 2 March 2026 (UTC)