Booking.com Post-Payment Terms Disclosure: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
m correct me if i'm wrong, but the formatting seems like it was done with an AI tool. |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{SloppyAI}} | |||
{{IncidentCargo | {{IncidentCargo | ||
|Company=Booking.com | |Company=Booking.com | ||
| Line 11: | Line 12: | ||
}} | }} | ||
Booking.com's booking platform has been documented as permitting third-party accommodation hosts to present material contractual terms to consumers only after payment has been processed. These post-payment terms have been reported to include provisions purporting to waive consumers' chargeback rights, imposing blanket liability waivers, and authorizing uncapped card charges — conditions that were not disclosed at the point of sale. | [[Booking.com]]'s booking platform has been documented as permitting third-party accommodation hosts to present material contractual terms to consumers only after payment has been processed. These post-payment terms have been reported to include provisions purporting to waive consumers' chargeback rights, imposing blanket liability waivers, and authorizing uncapped card charges — conditions that were not disclosed at the point of sale. | ||
Booking.com's own Terms of Service disclaim responsibility for host-set payment policies, and the platform's dispute handling has been characterized by addressing the "non-refundable" designation of bookings rather than the timing of material contractual disclosures. Regulatory enforcement actions in multiple jurisdictions have established a documented pattern of opaque and misleading practices in Booking.com's booking flow. | Booking.com's own Terms of Service disclaim responsibility for host-set payment policies, and the platform's dispute handling has been characterized by addressing the "non-refundable" designation of bookings rather than the timing of material contractual disclosures. Regulatory enforcement actions in multiple jurisdictions have established a documented pattern of opaque and misleading practices in Booking.com's booking flow. | ||
| Line 74: | Line 75: | ||
*The '''Connecticut Attorney General''', under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA) | *The '''Connecticut Attorney General''', under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA) | ||
*The '''California Attorney General''', under California's Unfair Competition Law (UCL) and Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA) | *The '''California Attorney General''', under California's Unfair Competition Law (UCL) and Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA) | ||
*The '''Federal Trade Commission''' (FTC), citing concerns about | *The '''Federal Trade Commission''' (FTC), citing concerns about the platform's payment flow design in enabling the post-payment disclosure of material contractual terms by third-party hosts | ||
the platform's payment flow design in enabling the post-payment | |||
disclosure of material contractual terms by third-party hosts | |||
These complaints characterize the concern as one of platform design: specifically, that Booking.com's payment flow structurally enables the post-payment introduction of material terms by third-party hosts, without adequate consumer disclosure mechanisms at the point of sale and without the platform accepting responsibility for those terms in dispute resolution. | These complaints characterize the concern as one of platform design: specifically, that Booking.com's payment flow structurally enables the post-payment introduction of material terms by third-party hosts, without adequate consumer disclosure mechanisms at the point of sale and without the platform accepting responsibility for those terms in dispute resolution. | ||
| Line 91: | Line 90: | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
[[Category:Booking.com]] | |||