Jump to content

Software locks: Difference between revisions

From Consumer Rights Wiki
Reform (talk | contribs)
Cleanup for clarity and defining it as something different than other theme articles in order to not have 3 times the same thing
Reform (talk | contribs)
Added deletion request
Line 3: Line 3:
As a softer version to [[activation]], and related to [[features on demand]], '''software-gating''' is a method to control access to ''features'' in consumer electronic hardware, but are not inherently anti-consumer as they provide useful for security features.       
As a softer version to [[activation]], and related to [[features on demand]], '''software-gating''' is a method to control access to ''features'' in consumer electronic hardware, but are not inherently anti-consumer as they provide useful for security features.       


This definition does not include closed-source, such as [[wikipedia:Proprietary_software|proprietary software]] or [[wikipedia:Proprietary_protocol|proprietary protocols]], as these can still provide the consumer with fully featured access without needing an account, app, or activation.       
This definition does not include closed-source, such as [[wikipedia:Proprietary_software|proprietary software]] or [[wikipedia:Proprietary_protocol|proprietary protocols]], as these can still provide the consumer with fully featured access without needing an account, app, or activation.      {{DeletionRequest|I merged it with software-gating, and rewired all previous links to this article to Activation - Reform}}See also


See also
*[[Digital rights management]]
 
* [[Digital rights management]]


==Anti-consumer examples==
==Anti-consumer examples==
Line 13: Line 11:
[[Forced account|Requiring an account]] in order to be used, such as with some Google Pixels and specific Android devices, and iPhones needing an Apple account create an easy entry-point for [[data lock-in]], making it harder to switch vendors.{{Citation needed|date=31 Mar 2026}}
[[Forced account|Requiring an account]] in order to be used, such as with some Google Pixels and specific Android devices, and iPhones needing an Apple account create an easy entry-point for [[data lock-in]], making it harder to switch vendors.{{Citation needed|date=31 Mar 2026}}


=== Forced app download ===
===Forced app download===
''Apps'' are a popular method for manufacturers to marketed features behind software locks. Examples of this are:
''Apps'' are a popular method for manufacturers to marketed features behind software locks. Examples of this are:


* Sony headphones requiring app to tweak its EQ
*Sony headphones requiring app to tweak its EQ


* HVAC app activation of furnace control boards.{{Citation needed|date=31 Mar 2026}}
*HVAC app activation of furnace control boards.{{Citation needed|date=31 Mar 2026}}


=== Activation & licensing ===
===Activation & licensing===
When features are locked behind an activation process, it will require server connectivity. Some implications of this include:
When features are locked behind an activation process, it will require server connectivity. Some implications of this include:


* Cloud services that are essential to keep the features working can be put offline
*Cloud services that are essential to keep the features working can be put offline


* The digital services can change in quality or become more privacy invasive over time
*The digital services can change in quality or become more privacy invasive over time


== See also ==
==See also==


* [[Digital rights management]]
*[[Digital rights management]]
* [[Walled garden]]
*[[Walled garden]]
* [[Bootloader unlocking]]
*[[Bootloader unlocking]]


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 20:24, 31 March 2026

Article Status Notice: This Article is a stub


This article is underdeveloped, and needs additional work to meet the wiki's Content Guidelines and be in line with our Mission Statement for comprehensive coverage of consumer protection issues. Learn more ▼

As a softer version to activation, and related to features on demand, software-gating is a method to control access to features in consumer electronic hardware, but are not inherently anti-consumer as they provide useful for security features.

This definition does not include closed-source, such as proprietary software or proprietary protocols, as these can still provide the consumer with fully featured access without needing an account, app, or activation.

⚠️ A deletion request has been made for this article

There has been a deletion request for this page for the following reason:

I merged it with software-gating, and rewired all previous links to this article to Activation - Reform


This request will be reviewed and acted upon by the wiki moderation team within one week of the template being added.

To appeal this deletion request, please make an entry at the Moderator's noticeboard.

Do not delete this page before removing all references to it:

See also

Anti-consumer examples

Forced account for data lock-in

Requiring an account in order to be used, such as with some Google Pixels and specific Android devices, and iPhones needing an Apple account create an easy entry-point for data lock-in, making it harder to switch vendors.[citation needed (31 Mar 2026)]

Forced app download

Apps are a popular method for manufacturers to marketed features behind software locks. Examples of this are:

  • Sony headphones requiring app to tweak its EQ
  • HVAC app activation of furnace control boards.[citation needed (31 Mar 2026)]

Activation & licensing

When features are locked behind an activation process, it will require server connectivity. Some implications of this include:

  • Cloud services that are essential to keep the features working can be put offline
  • The digital services can change in quality or become more privacy invasive over time

See also

References