CAPTCHA: Difference between revisions

Services such as [[Google]]'s [[reCAPTCHA]] have been found to be using human input to perform transcription work or train machine-learning models without user consent. On 22 January 2015, a Massachusetts class-action lawsuit attempted to argue Google should pay its users for their labor.<ref>{{Cite web |last1=Shapiro |first1=Thomas G. |last2=Vallely |first2=Patrick J. |title=''Rojas-Lozano v. Google Inc.'' (3:15-cv-10160) |url=https://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1904&context=historical |website=Santa Clara University School of Law Digital Commons |date=22 Jan 2015 |access-date=8 Apr 2026 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160209093438/https://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1904&context=historical |archive-date=9 Feb 2016}}</ref> Google's motion to transfer the case to the Northern District of California was granted 12 August 2015,<ref>{{Cite web |last=Mastroianni |first=Mark G. |title=''Rojas-Lozano v. Google Inc.'' (3:15-cv-10160) |url=https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5127913/31/rojas-lozano-v-google-inc/ |website=Court Listener |date=12 Aug 2015 |access-date=8 Apr 2026 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260409000656/https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5127913/31/rojas-lozano-v-google-inc/ |archive-date=9 Apr 2026}}</ref> where it was dismissed on 3 February 2016.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Corley |first=Jacqueline Scott |title=''Rojas-Lozano v. Google, Inc.'' (15-cv-03751-JSC) |url=https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/7318166/rojas-lozano-v-google-inc/ |website=Court Listener |date=3 Feb 2016 |access-date=8 Apr 2026 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://megalodon.jp/2026-0409-0933-59/https://www.courtlistener.com:443/opinion/7318166/rojas-lozano-v-google-inc/ |archive-date=9 Apr 2016}}</ref>