mNo edit summary
Line 108: Line 108:


Ads must not contain imagery depicting nudity, sexual activity, depictions of people in explicit or sexually suggestive positions, or activities that are sexually suggestive.<ref>{{Cite web |author= |title=Adult Nudity and Sexual Activity |url=https://transparency.meta.com/policies/ad-standards/objectionable-content/adult-nudity-and-sexual-activity/ |website=[[Meta]] |date= |access-date=14 Apr 2026 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260317185014/https://transparency.meta.com/policies/ad-standards/objectionable-content/adult-nudity-and-sexual-activity/ |archive-date=17 Mar 2026}}</ref>}}
Ads must not contain imagery depicting nudity, sexual activity, depictions of people in explicit or sexually suggestive positions, or activities that are sexually suggestive.<ref>{{Cite web |author= |title=Adult Nudity and Sexual Activity |url=https://transparency.meta.com/policies/ad-standards/objectionable-content/adult-nudity-and-sexual-activity/ |website=[[Meta]] |date= |access-date=14 Apr 2026 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260317185014/https://transparency.meta.com/policies/ad-standards/objectionable-content/adult-nudity-and-sexual-activity/ |archive-date=17 Mar 2026}}</ref>}}
A January 2025 report by the European nonprofit AI Forensics noted in 2024 Meta allowed 3,300 NSFW advertisements on its platforms, including Instagram.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/2463634-meta-allowed-pornographic-ads-that-break-its-content-moderation-rules/|title=Meta allowed pornographic ads that break its content moderation rules|date=2025-01-13|first=Jeremy|last=Hsu|work=New Scientist}}</ref>  LeMonde notes that in the ads that contained deepfakes, they are illegal in France.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.lemonde.fr/en/pixels/article/2025/01/08/thousands-of-pornographic-ads-go-unmoderated-on-facebook-and-instagram_6736832_13.html|title=Thousands of pornographic ads go unmoderated on Facebook and Instagram|first=Aurélien|last=Defer|date=2025-01-08|work=LeMonte}}</ref>


On 10 April 2026, a user on [[Reddit]] posted two self-censored screenshots of an Instagram video ad that depicted a man and a women having sexual intercourse with exposed breasts and genitalia.<ref>{{Cite web |author=playerno67 |title=Uncensored porn as ads??? |url=https://old.reddit.com/r/Instagram/comments/1shvl0k/uncensored_porn_as_ads/ |website=[[Reddit]] |date=10 Apr 2026 |access-date=10 Apr 2026 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/simGs |archive-date=10 Apr 2026}}</ref> The next day on 11 April, the ad account was "disabled" for violating Meta's advertising standards.<ref>{{Cite web |author= |title=Ad Library |url=https://www.facebook.com/ads/library/?active_status=active&ad_type=all&country=US&id=1171579384976792&is_targeted_country=false&media_type=all&search_type=page&sort_data[mode]=total_impressions&sort_data[direction]=desc&view_all_page_id=1027932660409176 |website=[[Meta]] |date=11 Apr 2026 |access-date=14 Apr 2026 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260415034918/https://consumerrights.wiki/w/File:Meta_ad_library_Gracet_Gracet_Baez_account_status.png |archive-date=15 Apr 2026}}</ref> The "Gracet Gracet Baez" account has not been banned as of 14 April 2026, and is still public on Facebook.<ref>{{Cite web |author= |title=Gracet Gracet Baez {{!}} Hà Đông |url=https://www.facebook.com/people/Gracet-Gracet-Baez/61572123681097/ |website=[[Facebook]] |date= |access-date=14 Apr 2026 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260415035725/https://consumerrights.wiki/w/File:Gracet_Gracet_Baez_H%C3%A0_%C4%90%C3%B4ng_Facebook_page.png |archive-date=15 Apr 2026}}</ref>
On 10 April 2026, a user on [[Reddit]] posted two self-censored screenshots of an Instagram video ad that depicted a man and a women having sexual intercourse with exposed breasts and genitalia.<ref>{{Cite web |author=playerno67 |title=Uncensored porn as ads??? |url=https://old.reddit.com/r/Instagram/comments/1shvl0k/uncensored_porn_as_ads/ |website=[[Reddit]] |date=10 Apr 2026 |access-date=10 Apr 2026 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/simGs |archive-date=10 Apr 2026}}</ref> The next day on 11 April, the ad account was "disabled" for violating Meta's advertising standards.<ref>{{Cite web |author= |title=Ad Library |url=https://www.facebook.com/ads/library/?active_status=active&ad_type=all&country=US&id=1171579384976792&is_targeted_country=false&media_type=all&search_type=page&sort_data[mode]=total_impressions&sort_data[direction]=desc&view_all_page_id=1027932660409176 |website=[[Meta]] |date=11 Apr 2026 |access-date=14 Apr 2026 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260415034918/https://consumerrights.wiki/w/File:Meta_ad_library_Gracet_Gracet_Baez_account_status.png |archive-date=15 Apr 2026}}</ref> The "Gracet Gracet Baez" account has not been banned as of 14 April 2026, and is still public on Facebook.<ref>{{Cite web |author= |title=Gracet Gracet Baez {{!}} Hà Đông |url=https://www.facebook.com/people/Gracet-Gracet-Baez/61572123681097/ |website=[[Facebook]] |date= |access-date=14 Apr 2026 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260415035725/https://consumerrights.wiki/w/File:Gracet_Gracet_Baez_H%C3%A0_%C4%90%C3%B4ng_Facebook_page.png |archive-date=15 Apr 2026}}</ref>