Rudxain
Joined 12 September 2025
mNo edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Visual edit |
link "Crap inhibitors" |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
If you're looking for a Linux article, see [[User:Rudxain/Unix|my page on Unix]]. | If you're looking for a Linux article, see [[User:Rudxain/Unix|my page on Unix]]. | ||
You might also be interested in my [https://web.archive.org/web/20260420215524/https://github.com/Rudxain/RX-wiki/blob/main/wiki/Crap_inhibitors.md "Crap inhibitors" article] (archived, because [https://github.com/Rudxain/Rudxain.github.io/issues/17 this]). | |||
BTW, I believe [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md my proposal for human-friendly contracts] is relevant for the CRW (possibly [[Hidden EULA language#Resources|there]]?). See [https://discord.com/channels/1324835844812443810/1324835844812443813/1476657529999065250 this message]:<blockquote>I've posted [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md this proposal for human-friendly contracts] a while back. There's some refs/sources that can be "mined" from it, but I believe most of the proposal is relevant to the CRW, so it deserves to be mentioned in some article. I'm asking because there's many articles where it could be referenced, so I'm not sure which is more "central" or relevant. Maybe this is a sign that there should be an article about "proposals for humane terms-of-service" or something similar? I did mention (in the post) that other people tried to solve similar problems</blockquote> | BTW, I believe [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md my proposal for human-friendly contracts] is relevant for the CRW (possibly [[Hidden EULA language#Resources|there]]?). See [https://discord.com/channels/1324835844812443810/1324835844812443813/1476657529999065250 this message]:<blockquote>I've posted [https://github.com/Rudxain/blog/blob/main/proposal/DRY-T&C.md this proposal for human-friendly contracts] a while back. There's some refs/sources that can be "mined" from it, but I believe most of the proposal is relevant to the CRW, so it deserves to be mentioned in some article. I'm asking because there's many articles where it could be referenced, so I'm not sure which is more "central" or relevant. Maybe this is a sign that there should be an article about "proposals for humane terms-of-service" or something similar? I did mention (in the post) that other people tried to solve similar problems</blockquote> | ||