Talk:DCS sues small YouTuber for accurate review: Difference between revisions
Add topicLatest comment: 22 April by IWillRememberMyPassword in topic Should lawsuit pages be titled for the actual cases?
→long title: Reply |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:{{Done}} [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|talk]]) 16:58, 21 April 2026 (UTC) | :{{Done}} [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|talk]]) 16:58, 21 April 2026 (UTC) | ||
== Should lawsuit pages be titled for the actual cases? == | |||
Question. The case itself is titled Deep Cycle Systems Pty Ltd v Fischer. The judgement is publicly available and should also be posted. [[User:IWillRememberMyPassword|IWillRememberMyPassword]] ([[User talk:IWillRememberMyPassword|talk]]) 14:25, 22 April 2026 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:25, 22 April 2026
long title
[edit source]perhaps we change to smth like "DCS sues YouTuber for accurate review of their product"? SinexTitan (talk) 22:46, 21 January 2026 (UTC)
Should lawsuit pages be titled for the actual cases?
[edit source]Question. The case itself is titled Deep Cycle Systems Pty Ltd v Fischer. The judgement is publicly available and should also be posted. IWillRememberMyPassword (talk) 14:25, 22 April 2026 (UTC)