Autodesk: Difference between revisions

Line 62:

In 2007, [[wikipedia:Autodesk_Mudbox|Mudbox]] was bought by Autodesk. the software has had multiple new version releases, but no updates.

===Vernor v. Autodesk, Inc. (''2007'')===

===''Vernor v. Autodesk, Inc.'' (''2007'')===

In 2007, Timothy Vernor tried to sell his physical copy of Autodesk. Autodesk sued Vernor for copyright infringement in Timothy Vernor v. Autodesk, Inc as Vernor's purchase was for a license. The case made its way to the US Court of Appeals ~~9th~~ Circuit, where it was decided in Autodesk's favor, limiting the [[first-sale doctrine]]<ref name=":6" />.

In 2007, Timothy Vernor tried to sell his physical copy of Autodesk. Autodesk sued Vernor for copyright infringement in ''Timothy Vernor v. Autodesk, Inc'' as Vernor's purchase was for a license. The case made its way to the US Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit, where it was decided in Autodesk's favor, limiting the [[first-sale doctrine]]<ref name=":6" />.

~~'''~~Selective product activation based on location~~'''~~

===Selective product activation based on location===

Due to EU law perpetual licenses are required to be able to be sold or transferred, allowing licenses as old as the 2010 version of AutoCAD LT and AutoCAD to be activated on new computers (as of 2024) due to the nature of the server side activation codes generated for perpetual licenses. The timetable of allowing only certain versions to be activated and that version number reaching ever closer to the current version is so that the activation server can be removed entirely in favor of the licensing model they currently use. Many of the steps used to ensure less users are able to activate their perpetual licenses include:

Due to EU law perpetual licenses are required to be able to be sold or transferred, allowing licenses as old as the 2010 version of AutoCAD LT and AutoCAD to be activated on new computers (as of 2024) due to the nature of the server side activation codes generated for perpetual licenses. The timetable of allowing only certain version to be activated and that number getting closer and closer to the current version is so that the activation server can be removed entirely in favor of the licensing model they currently use, many of the steps used to ensure less users are able to activate their perpetual licenses include removing product keys from their website~~, offering~~ trade ins for discounts on their licenses~~, denying~~ activation of perpetual licenses after the version is no longer supported officially, even if the capabilities are still there to follow EU laws~~, and, as previously stated in this article, going~~ after pirated versions of the software which may include people who have legitimate perpetual licenses but couldn't get activations through Autodesk so may have circumvented that security feature by generating an activation code some other way, or again some errors may have been the issue at hand causing a false positive for the "piracy" in question. ~~removing~~ articles for troubleshooting certain errors for older versions of their software ~~is also known to have happened even if the data still exists and a way back machine would make the information available.~~ In short Autodesk only provides license transfers in places that legally require them to do so, which includes at least one activation of the license in question, even if the software is no longer supported on paper~~, and everyone else~~ with a valid license ~~who can't use it is just plain out~~ of ~~luck~~.

*Removing product keys from their website

*Offering trade-ins for discounts on their licenses

*Denying activation of perpetual licenses after the version is no longer supported officially (even if the capabilities are still there to follow EU laws)

*Going after pirated versions of the software, which may include people who have legitimate perpetual licenses but couldn't get activations through Autodesk so may have circumvented that security feature by generating an activation code some other way, or again some errors may have been the issue at hand causing a false positive for the "piracy" in question.

*Removing articles for troubleshooting certain errors for older versions of their software

In short Autodesk only provides license transfers in places that legally require them to do so, which includes at least one activation of the license in question, even if the software is no longer supported on paper. Any consumer with an unusable valid license located outside of such jurisdictions are left with no recourse.

==Products==

@@ Line 62: / Line 62: @@
 In 2007, [[wikipedia:Autodesk_Mudbox|Mudbox]] was bought by Autodesk. the software has had multiple new version releases, but no updates.
-===Vernor v. Autodesk, Inc. (''2007'')===
+===''Vernor v. Autodesk, Inc.'' (''2007'')===
-In 2007, Timothy Vernor tried to sell his physical copy of Autodesk. Autodesk sued Vernor for copyright infringement in Timothy Vernor v. Autodesk, Inc as Vernor's purchase was for a license. The case made its way to the US Court of Appeals 9th Circuit, where it was decided in Autodesk's favor, limiting the [[first-sale doctrine]]<ref name=":6" />.
+In 2007, Timothy Vernor tried to sell his physical copy of Autodesk. Autodesk sued Vernor for copyright infringement in ''Timothy Vernor v. Autodesk, Inc'' as Vernor's purchase was for a license. The case made its way to the US Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit, where it was decided in Autodesk's favor, limiting the [[first-sale doctrine]]<ref name=":6" />.
-'''Selective product activation based on location'''
+===Selective product activation based on location===
+Due to EU law perpetual licenses are required to be able to be sold or transferred, allowing licenses as old as the 2010 version of AutoCAD LT and AutoCAD to be activated on new computers (as of 2024) due to the nature of the server side activation codes generated for perpetual licenses. The timetable of allowing only certain versions to be activated and that version number reaching ever closer to the current version is so that the activation server can be removed entirely in favor of the licensing model they currently use. Many of the steps used to ensure less users are able to activate their perpetual licenses include:
-Due to EU law perpetual licenses are required to be able to be sold or transferred, allowing licenses as old as the 2010 version of AutoCAD LT and AutoCAD to be activated on new computers (as of 2024) due to the nature of the server side activation codes generated for perpetual licenses. The timetable of allowing only certain version to be activated and that number getting closer and closer to the current version is so that the activation server can be removed entirely in favor of the licensing model they currently use, many of the steps used to ensure less users are able to activate their perpetual licenses include removing product keys from their website, offering trade ins for discounts on their licenses, denying activation of perpetual licenses after the version is no longer supported officially, even if the capabilities are still there to follow EU laws, and, as previously stated in this article, going after pirated versions of the software which may include people who have legitimate perpetual licenses but couldn't get activations through Autodesk so may have circumvented that security feature by generating an activation code some other way, or again some errors may have been the issue at hand causing a false positive for the "piracy"  in question. removing articles for troubleshooting certain errors for older versions of their software is also known to have happened even if the data still exists and a way back machine would make the information available. In short Autodesk only provides license transfers in places that legally require them to do so, which includes at least one activation of the license in question, even if the software is no longer supported on paper, and everyone else with a valid license who can't use it is just plain out of luck.
+*Removing product keys from their website
+*Offering trade-ins for discounts on their licenses
+*Denying activation of perpetual licenses after the version is no longer supported officially (even if the capabilities are still there to follow EU laws)
+*Going after pirated versions of the software, which may include people who have legitimate perpetual licenses but couldn't get activations through Autodesk so may have circumvented that security feature by generating an activation code some other way, or again some errors may have been the issue at hand causing a false positive for the "piracy"  in question. <!-- This line should be re-written to be concise and clear. -Sojourna -->
+*Removing articles for troubleshooting certain errors for older versions of their software
+In short Autodesk only provides license transfers in places that legally require them to do so, which includes at least one activation of the license in question, even if the software is no longer supported on paper. Any consumer with an unusable valid license located outside of such jurisdictions are left with no recourse.
 ==Products<!-- I personally remember taking a class that used Inventor, and the spotty internet connection some computers in the industrial building would have on occasion would make it HELL for me to do classes since if the internet went out and I did not save before then, I had to start from scratch! LITERALLY forced me to drop my class halfway through because of this, and I did not get my money back for it! - JamesTDG -->==