Consumer Rights Wiki talk:Moderators' noticeboard: Difference between revisions
→Excerpt: Reply |
→Excerpt: Reply |
||
| Line 214: | Line 214: | ||
::Grabbing Keith for you since it’s been a couple hours. - [[User:Atsumari|Atsumari]] ([[User talk:Atsumari|talk]]) 20:23, 19 May 2026 (UTC) | ::Grabbing Keith for you since it’s been a couple hours. - [[User:Atsumari|Atsumari]] ([[User talk:Atsumari|talk]]) 20:23, 19 May 2026 (UTC) | ||
:Yeah, would be happy to! I assume the scope of it is 'any page in which another page is described in brief should use an excerpt of the other page, rather than a custom summary'? [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 00:05, 20 May 2026 (UTC) | :Yeah, would be happy to! I assume the scope of it is 'any page in which another page is described in brief should use an excerpt of the other page, rather than a custom summary'? [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 00:05, 20 May 2026 (UTC) | ||
::Yes. Currently it's a either verbatim copy of the Incident page lead section or a custom summary. The verbatim copy results in some users updating one but not the other, and then they diverge in content, sometimes missing important facts in all relevant places. Custom summary may sometimes be preferable. | |||
::The incident articles themselves should also be written in a way that the lead section is a summary of the incident with up to date status. | |||
::Ideally we should make people aware of the feature, so new articles and summaries are written with using excerpts in mind. [[User:Tracerneo|Tracerneo]] ([[User talk:Tracerneo|talk]]) 00:27, 20 May 2026 (UTC) | |||