Talk:Anthropic's Claude Code source leak: Difference between revisions
→Relevance discussion: new section |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Relevance discussion == | ==Relevance discussion== | ||
Just starting this discussion for people to talk about whether or not this page is relevant @[[User:Tracerneo|Tracerneo]] @[[User:Linka|Linka]] | Just starting this discussion for people to talk about whether or not this page is relevant @[[User:Tracerneo|Tracerneo]] @[[User:Linka|Linka]] | ||
In general it's best practice to start a relevancy discussion when marking a page as irrelevant, so that previous contributors have an opportunity to understand and respond to the reasons why it has been marked as such. [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 01:52, 28 May 2026 (UTC) | In general it's best practice to start a relevancy discussion when marking a page as irrelevant, so that previous contributors have an opportunity to understand and respond to the reasons why it has been marked as such. [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 01:52, 28 May 2026 (UTC) | ||
To add my thoughts here: I'm not seeing how this is related to or affects consumer rights. One could perhaps argue that the take-down of legitimate repositories constitutes an issue, however even that is ''very'' tenuous. Such persons being affected would not have even occurred in the first place if other users in the communities hadn't ''knowingly'' uploaded infringing content. The fault lies much more on them than it does Anthropic. — [[User:Sojourna|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna|talk]]) 03:59, 28 May 2026 (UTC) | |||